A) An opinion favouring one viewpoint
If I was a hollywood movie producer and I am remaking this video for a 21st century audience, I would want to have Morgan Freeman as my speaker and set the scene at a futuristic setting. A futuristic setting would include any science fiction concepts. Having Morgan Freeman would not only make the audience get interested with a video having a familiar voice in it, but it would give depth and meaning to the entire idea itself. It would align with the on going trends of the 21st century. It would also make it entertaining. While making this, I would make sure to still hold the video contents but with more added features to make the video enticing. Also add probably more animations or simulations to show what the video actually means.
The definition of a meter: Distance traversed in vacuum by light in 1/299,792,458 of a second.
According to this light travels 299,792,458 meters in a second. A nanosecond is 1 billionth of a second so light travels 299792458 / 1,000,000,000 meters in a nanosecond or 0.299792458m. (In a vacuum).
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Kalani’s Argument: My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.
Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).
Which argument is more convincing?
Answer:
Kalani's argument is more convincing.
Explanation:
Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.
Answer:
make or become (ex: fossilize)
OR
treat in a specified way (ex: pasteurize)
Explanation:
