The fact that you didn’t see the teddy bear is probably due to: <u>your schema that puppies are destructive</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Psychologist use the term schema to describes a pattern of thought or behavior that classifies the information and expresses the relationships among them. Schemas allow us to take shortcuts in understanding the huge amount of information available in the environment.
In the above scenario, when I returned home from work I noticed some broken glass pieces on the floor. I thought that it would be my new puppy. I didn’t notice my kid’s teddy bear on the floor. My schema made me to think that puppies are destructive.
To reach $700 in a week, Sharon needs to sell at least 24 items per week.
Answer:
Explanation:
The would want to gain independence if a certain type feels they have no voice, or are having to many/to strict of rules. The problems would be, creating new rules, new currency, new protection etc.
Answer:Their treatment of Alison most clearly illustrates Ostracism.
Explanation:
Ostracism occurs when a social group intentionally excludes someone and does not accept them as member of the group.
This forms part of social rejection when one is not being welcomed within a group or by a certain individual if this continues for a long time an ostracized individual may start to feel lonely which may lead to depression or aggression.
Like Alison is being ignored and excluded from after school activities which may make her be a loner and start to feel unworthy or if may start to make her violent towards others as a defensive mechanism or a way of taking her emotions out.
Answer:
That those who do not distinguish between law and religion are quick to judge and condemn others.
Explanation:
The passage we are analyzing was taken from the novel "The Scarlet Letter", by Nathaniel Hawthorne. As we know, the book tells the fictional story of a woman who is greatly punished for being a single mother. Sleeping with someone and getting pregnant, even if both people involved were not married to other people, was regarded as adultery in puritan Boston. In the passage, the author shows the people who were ready to condemn did so because they believed they were doing what was right. They saw no distinction between religion and law. And they would apply any type of punishment with the same severity, since all crimes, no matter how big or small, were an offense to their religious principles, were a sin. As is stated in the book:
<em>[...] there was very much the same solemnity of demeanour on the part of the spectators; as befitted a people amongst whom religion and law were almost identical, and in whose character both were so thoroughly interfused, that the mildest and the severest acts of public discipline were alike made venerable and awful. Meagre, indeed, and cold, was the sympathy that a transgressor might look for, from such bystanders at the scaffold.</em>
