Supreme Court, is the highest court in the judicial system, and it is the last court for resolving non-constitutional matters.
The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke by the following:
(B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.
<h3>The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke</h3><h3 />
- The supreme court on June 18, 1978, declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidate the use of racial qoutes.
- Allan Bakke, a white man of California, filed a complaint against The medical school at the University of California, Davis.
- He applied twice to the medical school and with good marks but didnt get admission.
- Bakke said he had been subjected to unjust "race discrimination."
- In the Court, six separate opinions were issued, agreed that the university’s use of racial quotas was unconstitutional, and ordered that the medical school admit Bakke.
Thus, option (B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions is correct.
To know more about Supreme Court, visit here:
brainly.com/question/1755400
The state court system is a Three Tier System containing courts of first instance, intermediate appellate courts, and the state supreme court
hope this helps
Answer:
Role-Related Behavior
Explanation:
Role-related behavior refers to the behavior that driven by expectation that other people have toward us within a specific environment.
For example, Let's say that Laura is happily a married woman woman with 2 children who works as a general manager in an automobile company.
In her house, her children know her as a caring and compassionate mother but in her workplace she is known for being strict and efficient.
These two difference is caused by role-related behavior. She is expected by their children to nurture and protect them. But in her workplace, the expectation is different. She is expected to lead her team and ensure that they do their jobs.
