1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tekilochka [14]
3 years ago
13

What are some challenges of having large cities?

History
2 answers:
Zielflug [23.3K]3 years ago
7 0
  • Environmental threats. Rapid urbanization, which strains basic infrastructure, coupled with more frequent and extreme weather events linked to global climate change is exacerbating the impact of environmental threats. ...
  • Resources.
  • Inequality.
  • Technology.
  • Governance.
Arte-miy333 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Question-

What are some challenges of having large cities?

Answer-

Industrialization typically leads to the migration of workers to cities, automation and repetitive tasks. ... Rapid urbanization broughton by industrialization typically leads to general deterioration of workers' quality of life and many other problems for society, such as crime, stress and psychological disorders.


Hope i helped. Can i get brainliest if im right?

You might be interested in
What were 7 causes of ww1
satela [25.4K]

1. Friends don’t let friends fight alone
A tangled web of strong political alliances among nations meant that most great powers felt obliged to help their partners once war was declared.

After the murder of an Austrian Archduke by Serbian assassins, Austria-Hungary prepared for war against Serbia, which was allied with Russia.

Once Russia mobilized, Austria-Hungary’s ally, Germany, declared war on both Russia and Russia’s ally, France. Great Britain and its empire, sympathetic to France, declared war on Germany (Canada was not consulted).

Alliances originally intended as defensive pacts ended up looking threatening to outsiders. This perilous network of allegiances is an accepted part of all narratives about the First World War. German historian Andreas Hilgruber was one of many who showed how dangerous and costly all of these alliances were.

2. Armed to the teeth
Europe in 1914 was armed to the teeth. Vast fleets of warships were being constructed, conscription was implemented in most of the great powers to allow large armies to be kept in reserve, weapons and ammunition were stockpiled, and detailed war plans were made.

The impact of the proliferation of the instruments of war as a cause of the outbreak of the conflict was highlighted by David Stevenson’s Armaments and the Coming of War (1996). A large army spoiling for a fight may well seek one out.

3. Capitalist imperialism
During the First World War, Vladimir Lenin, the father of the Soviet Union, wrote an essay entitled Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917), in which he laid out the foundation of his own philosophy of communism.

He believed that the war was the product of capitalist financial monopolies within states, which created national rivalries and led the great powers into a destructive conflict over access to raw materials and undeveloped markets.

Others since have blamed imperialism itself and commercial interests.

4. War on a tight schedule
A.J.P. Taylor, one of the 20th century’s great historians, argued in War by Timetable (1969) that in 1914, thanks to relatively new transportation (railroad) and communications (telegraph and telephone) technologies, every European power believed that the ability to mobilize their armies faster than their neighbours would by itself deter war.

Every power drafted elaborate mobilization timetables so that they could outrace their potential opponents. When the crisis of 1914 occurred, none of the leaders really wanted war, according to Taylor, but each felt they had to mobilize faster than the others or lose the advantage.

They became the victims of their own logistical preparations, and Europe slid unwillingly but relentlessly into war. Barbara Tuchman’s book The Guns of August (1962) similarly identified the dangers of technology in causing conflicts to escalate rapidly.

5. Blame Germany
In the Treaty of Versailles that officially ended the war, Germany was made to accept the blame for causing the conflict, and after that German governments spent decades denying their sole responsibility.

They convinced many people, but after the Second World War, German historian Fritz Fischer looked into previously-classified archives for the first time. Fischer concluded in his book German War Aims in the First World War (1961) that Imperial Germany had deliberately provoked a general war as part of a policy of conquest much like that undertaken by Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany 20 years later.

Fischer’s conclusions remain controversial to this day.

6. No, blame Britain
The idea that Britain caused the war was the live grenade that firebrand historian Niall Ferguson lobbed into the debate when he wrote The Pity of War (1999), though Paul Schroeder had put forward a similar argument earlier.

Ferguson claimed that not only did British statesmen encourage France and Russia to oppose Germany, but that Britain’s own intervention turned a regional European brawl into a global war.

The British may not have directly started it, according to Ferguson, but they were liable for greatly expanding the scope of the war and making it drag on as long as it did.

7. People being people
Canadian historian Margaret Macmillan has published a major book, The War That Ended Peace (2013), which presents a synthesis of many different factors: alliances and power politics; reckless diplomacy; ethnic nationalism; and, most of all, the personal character and relationships of the almost uncountable number of historical figures who had a hand in the coming of war.

Her work helps to highlight the fact that for all the great and powerful forces that seemed to grind the world inexorably into war in 1914, everything ultimately came down to the beliefs, prejudices, rivalries, and schemes of a great array of personalities and people.

7 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt below.
juin [17]

Answer:

C-Write a constitution while the chance exists.

Explanation:

Thomas Paine defended why America should be independent of Britain, and he listed a series of reasons, and he also outlined his thoughts on a new constitution for America. He depicted what the state assemblies should do, how many members the congress should have, how the congress would choose their president, and listed how the conference should be held and the Charter of the United Colonies.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do we use artifacts to learn about early people and cultures
saul85 [17]

by learning them and committing them to memory

6 0
3 years ago
What religion spread from india to china , then japan ?
Westkost [7]
I think it is something like Hunda
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which role did the Texas Rangers have?
harina [27]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Over the years, the Texas Rangers have investigated crimes ranging from murder to political corruption, acted in riot control and as detectives, protected the governor of Texas, tracked down fugitives, and functioned as a paramilitary force at the service of both the Republic (1836–1845) and the state of Texas.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is the best meaning of the word covert in the following sentence? Antony and Octavius make covert plans to stay in power.
    7·2 answers
  • Which of these issues did the three fifths compromise tackle?​
    10·1 answer
  • What's an example of war time repression under President Wilson
    13·1 answer
  • What kind of case was brought against russell dunmore?
    7·1 answer
  • Which best explains an effect of the Diaspora on Jewish people?
    15·1 answer
  • Which describes the term classical as it applies to historic eras
    9·1 answer
  • Between which two years did the population of<br> Chinese in the US almost double?
    6·1 answer
  • This is the name of the nonprofit special interest group who attempts to unhold the second amendment to the us constitution
    7·1 answer
  • In the early 1800s, the federal government wanted American Indians who did not assimilate to
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Spanish and Portuguese determine which country got which parts of the Americas?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!