1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Evgen [1.6K]
3 years ago
14

During the cold war, india's decision to support neither the united states nor the soviet union was based on the policy of

History
2 answers:
olga55 [171]3 years ago
7 0
Choosing not to back either side is known as neutrality. India would have been considered neutral in the conflict.
o-na [289]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<h2>Non-Alignment</h2>

History/context:

As the superpowers in the Cold War, the USA and the USSR, sought to line up countries in allegiance with their positions, a group of nations emphasized the importance for remaining non-aligned.  One of the leaders of the Non-Aligned Movement, India's prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru, said in a speech in 1948:  "When we say our policy is one of non-alignment, obviously we mean non-alignment with military blocs."  The Non-Aligned Movement held its first conference in Belgrade, Yugoslavia in 1961.  The members of the movement saw the siding up being done in the Cold War as a path to increasing world tension and conflict, and sought to remain non-aligned for the sake of preserving peace and equal opportunity for development.

You might be interested in
What did north Vietnam want in the Vietnam war
Valentin [98]

Answer:

At the heart of the conflict was the desire of North Vietnam, which had defeated the French colonial administration of Vietnam in 1954, to unify the entire country under a single communist regime modeled after those of the Soviet Union and China

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do Bureaucrats NOT do?
grigory [225]

Answer:

D-Reorganize

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Were colonies useful mostly because they provided a ready market for manufactured goods?
Oksanka [162]
No. European countries wanted colonies because they wanted to gain more wealth. Gold and silver from the colonies made the countries richer. Another reason was for the raw materials that they needed for their factories. Getting raw materials from the colonies was much cheaper than buying from other countries. One more reason was the desire for land and power. Having colonies made replenishing  supplies easier and in case of war, the colonies could be used as military bases.
4 0
3 years ago
Which two empires split because of world was 1
crimeas [40]
The Ottoman empire split because of ww1

and the Russian empire

hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
1. ज्ञान से संबंधित उक्तियाँ लिखिए<br> Ans <br><br> 2. तीनों राजकुमार कहाँ पढ़ते थे ?<br> Ans
bazaltina [42]
1. Ability, wisdom, and intelligence (there’s more but here’s 3)
2. Royals have travelled the span of the UK to attend, from St Andrews in Scotland to Cambridge University
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What government entity managed the purchasing of military supplies
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following words means refusing to buy something?
    5·2 answers
  • Jazz scholar Nathan Davis asks,“What kind of music might we have had if African slaves had been taken to China or Japan or any o
    12·1 answer
  • Leaders of the Southern states that seceded from the Union were most concerned about which of these problems?
    6·2 answers
  • THIS IS ENGLISH I JUST PUT HISTORY!!!
    8·1 answer
  • What speech did Abraham Linclon after the civil war?​
    11·2 answers
  • What was an arguement made by women in the progressive movement
    8·1 answer
  • How do interest groups influence the public? Describe at least three methods interest groups use.
    15·2 answers
  • The Assyrian empire could best be described as...
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a consequence of the Industrial Revolution?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!