No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>
</span>
Cash crops such as tobacco, cotton, <span>wheat, and indigo. </span>
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the sixth choice. One of the reason of the decline of the empire is violence, and the best example of which is the assassination of Julius Caesar. I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
The fact that women were increasingly expected to adhere to traditional gender roles, but more women than ever participated in the workforce, describes a contradiction between cultural expectations and actual outcomes for women during the 1950s.
<h3>What is gender role?</h3>
Typecasting a form of occupation or responsibility for a gender in a particular society during any given period of time, which may be subject to change, are known as gender roles.
The gender roles of women in the society during the 1950s were that they shall remain domesticated; however, the women joined the workforce and assumed newer gender roles for themselves.
Hence, option A holds true regarding the gender role of women during the 1950s.
Learn more about gender roles here:
brainly.com/question/759452
#SPJ1
B. AT NOON
:) I did it and got it right
