1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yuradex [85]
3 years ago
12

How did the play set not break?

History
1 answer:
Debora [2.8K]3 years ago
7 0

well the play set didn't break because it looks like it can fit them the three people but dam they are sure big

You might be interested in
20 POINTS HELP PLS
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

Written by James Madison, this essay defended the form of republican government proposed by the Constitution. ... In response, Madison explored majority rule v. minority rights in this essay. He countered that it was exactly the great number of factions and diversity that would avoid tyranny.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why do people support the Right to Bear Arms amendment?
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

Explanation:Modern debates about the Second Amendment have focused on whether it protects a private right of individuals to keep and bear arms, or a right that can be exercised only through militia organizations like the National Guard. This question, however, was not even raised until long after the Bill of Rights was adopted.

Many in the Founding generation believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people. English history suggested that this risk could be controlled by permitting the government to raise armies (consisting of full-time paid troops) only when needed to fight foreign adversaries. For other purposes, such as responding to sudden invasions or other emergencies, the government could rely on a militia that consisted of ordinary civilians who supplied their own weapons and received some part-time, unpaid military training.

The onset of war does not always allow time to raise and train an army, and the Revolutionary War showed that militia forces could not be relied on for national defense. The Constitutional Convention therefore decided that the federal government should have almost unfettered authority to establish peacetime standing armies and to regulate the militia.

This massive shift of power from the states to the federal government generated one of the chief objections to the proposed Constitution. Anti-Federalists argued that the proposed Constitution would take from the states their principal means of defense against federal usurpation. The Federalists responded that fears of federal oppression were overblown, in part because the American people were armed and would be almost impossible to subdue through military force.

Implicit in the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two shared assumptions. First, that the proposed new Constitution gave the federal government almost total legal authority over the army and militia. Second, that the federal government should not have any authority at all to disarm the citizenry. They disagreed only about whether an armed populace could adequately deter federal oppression.

The Second Amendment conceded nothing to the Anti-Federalists’ desire to sharply curtail the military power of the federal government, which would have required substantial changes in the original Constitution. Yet the Amendment was easily accepted because of widespread agreement that the federal government should not have the power to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms, any more than it should have the power to abridge the freedom of speech or prohibit the free exercise of religion.

Much has changed since 1791. The traditional militia fell into desuetude, and state-based militia organizations were eventually incorporated into the federal military structure. The nation’s military establishment has become enormously more powerful than eighteenth century armies. We still hear political rhetoric about federal tyranny, but most Americans do not fear the nation’s armed forces and virtually no one thinks that an armed populace could defeat those forces in battle. Furthermore, eighteenth century civilians routinely kept at home the very same weapons they would need if called to serve in the militia, while modern soldiers are equipped with weapons that differ significantly from those generally thought appropriate for civilian uses. Civilians no longer expect to use their household weapons for militia duty, although they still keep and bear arms to defend against common criminals (as well as for hunting and other forms of recreation).

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the five factors that led Germany to sue for peace.
Vesnalui [34]
Paris peace conference
treaty of versailles
league of nations
german reparations
ww1 ended but international relations badly damaged
8 0
3 years ago
What is the word that means can be helpful or harmful to depending on point of view?
blagie [28]
The word which means "can be helpful or harmful depending on the point of view" is beaver. Beaver can both have a good and a bad effect to the ecosystem. In a good point of view, beaver serves as natural filters segregating sediments from flowing to bodies of water. On the other hand, it can also cause flooding.
8 0
3 years ago
“Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve . . . the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human r
Dmitry [639]
Sets the mission statement--the preamble sets a mission statement or goal of the document and what it seeks to provide through the UN. 

The UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights focuses on the well-being of world citizens and the responsibility of countries to protect the rights of their people. This declaration has set guidelines for expected behavior of countries and continually revises their perspective on human rights issues. 
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How is American culture in combination of different influences
    6·1 answer
  • What is an agricultural marketing cooperative that helps members sell their products?
    5·1 answer
  • what palestine was a mandate of which country after world war 1 israel, great britain, US, turkey
    12·2 answers
  • Please help fast am having trouble, ty
    11·1 answer
  • What was hitlers goal in ww2?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did Spanish explorers look for the Seven Cities of Gold?
    6·2 answers
  • Why did some people turn toward democratic forms of government during this time
    8·1 answer
  • The US has a mixed market economy, which means individuals and businesses enjoy many freedoms and the right to own private prope
    13·1 answer
  • Question 5. Which claim is accurate about the areas on this map where Islam spread?​
    8·1 answer
  • Why did President Johnson deviate from his original plan of punishing Southern aristocrats by making it difficult for states to
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!