Answer: the correct answer is multidisciplinary.
Explanation:
Multidisciplinary approach relates on a number of factors like neuroscience or social science.
Answer:
The answer is - Optimistic
Explanation:
Explanatory style is the way in which we explain the events that happen to us in our lives, either good or bad. There is the pessimistic explanatory style and the optimistic explanatory style.
The optimistic explanatory style are characterized by explanations for negative outcomes as being due to unstable, specific and external causes so we do not blame ourselves 100% for things that go wrong, and that the negative events will end soon and they would not let it affect too many aspects of their lives. While positive outcomes are seen as being due to stable, global and internal causes.
Lara is using optimistic explanatory style therefore she tends to have more positive explanatory style as she takes credit for positive experiences, believes that the good things will last and they will favorably affect other aspects of her life.
forensic anthropologist Karen burns investigated alleged atrocities in northern Iraq following the 1991 gulf war. she established that one individual was murdered (and not buried by his family) simply through evidence of two polyester threads attached to his legs.
<h3>Who is forensic anthropologist?</h3>
Bones and other hard tissues are the focus of forensic anthropologists' research. They are knowledgeable with uncovering buried remains and methodically recording the facts due to their background in archaeology.
<h3>Who is anthropologist?</h3>
A person who practices anthropology is known as an anthropologist. Anthropology is the study of human characteristics in relation to both historical and contemporary society.
To know more about anthropologist visit: brainly.com/question/27268699
#SPJ4
The correct answer is irony
Sarcasm and Irony are ways of expressing a statement with a connotative meaning, that is, figurative.
Irony, on the other hand, means “asking by pretending not to know the answer”, “disguise” or “concealment”. The curious thing is that this word has been used, in the past, to refer to ignorance or ignorance about something.
Since the Aristotelian period, sarcasm and irony were already recorded in the speeches. The philosopher Aristotle used these artifices of language when pretending not to understand the idea expressed by the interlocutor, confronting him until he came to a contradiction in speech.
The grammar explains sarcasm and irony as figures of speech used outside their real meaning, which express a tone of debauchery. The difference between sarcasm and irony is that while the first is said in a malicious and harsh tone, the second is a contradictory phrase that generally has a sense of humor.
Answer:
All the statements are true
Explanation:
Viscosity is affected by temperature. For example, if we put heat over some liquids like honey and syrup, they tend to flow more freely. On the other hand, if the temperature gets cold the viscosity tends to thicken (ex: engine oil of a car during winter). These examples make the first statement true: “Viscosity increases as temperature decreases”. Viscosity is affected by pressure too. To see a change in a “molecular level”, the pressure needs to be very extreme. This make the second statement true: “Viscosity increases as molecular weight increases”. Taking in consideration both statements, we can conclude that the third statement is also correct. When viscosity is put into heat and little pressure, it tends to lessen, since the interaction between the molecules decreases and the intermolecular forces decreases. On the other hand, by default, when viscosity is put in a cold weather and pressure increases, the level of viscosity thickens, since the molecules start colliding and their motion becomes disorganized.
