In positive punishment contingent removal of an aversive stimulus reduces the likelihood that the response will occur again in the future.
In negative punishment the contingent presentation of a stimulus reduces the likelihood the response will occur again in the future.
<h3>What do positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement have in common with each other?</h3>
- Punishment can be used in a positive or bad way, much like reinforcement.
- Any reinforcer, whether positive or negative, makes a behavioral response more likely.
- Positive or negative punishments both reduce the chance of a behavioral response.
<h3>What is reinforcement and its types?</h3>
- Everything that strengthens or improves a behavior qualifies as reinforcement.
- For instance, in a classroom context, forms of reinforcement may include praise, allowing pupils skip over unneeded assignments, or offering out small rewards like candy, extra downtime, or enjoyable hobbies.
<h3>What is positive and negative reinforcement and punishment?</h3>
- By including something desired, positive reinforcement improves the intended behavior (good).
- Aversive reinforcement reduces the goal behavior in positive punishment (bad).
- By removing an unpleasant stimulus, negative reinforcement makes the intended behavior more frequent.
Learn more about positive and negative reinforcement here:
brainly.com/question/2994390
#SPJ4
Answer:
the answer is B Assimilation
Explanation:
Forced assimilation is an involuntary process of cultural assimilation of religious or ethnic minority groups during which they are forced to adopt language, identity, norms, mores, customs, traditions, values, mentality, perceptions, way of life, and often religion and ideology of established and generally larger.
In the United States, during the great war, the American government did burn most German books. In the United States and Canada, forced assimilation had been practiced against indigenous peoples through the Indian residential school system and Indian boarding schools.
Forced assimilation is rarely successful, and it generally has enduring negative consequences for the recipient culture. Voluntary assimilation, albeit usually effected under pressure from the dominant culture, has also been prevalent in the historical record.
The House is the larger of Congress's two legislative bodies. Its membership is based on the population of each individual state. By law, its current membership is set at 435 Representatives, plus nonvoting delegates from the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories
I believe that it's okay because everyone has some type of weakness in them. But I do think that something needs to be done because it's not something normal. For example, a normal human sees the color red, but a person with false memory syndrome sees yellow and they truly believe that it's the color yellow. So that's why I think something needs to be done. But at the same time, I don't think the person with false memory syndrome should be criticized.
* Hopefully this helps you:) Mark me the brainliest:)!!!
I’d prefer German economy only because they have a highly developed social market and a large economy and British haves a small poor economy now the question is would you rather be in a poor economy or a highly developed economy German is the best answer because if your poor you got less food less water less survival German you got money