focus on the hunter supporting children and elderly family members. they are very poor, not able to support either, for legitimate jobs are rare...
Answer: The word or phrase which best replaces the underlined part of the sentence to remove the logical fallacy is:
that person.
Explanation:
Even though there isn't any underlined word in the sentence, it can safely be assumed that the word would be "people". A fallacy exist in using "people" because, before, the speaker began by talking about "someone".
Someone is just one person. How then did we go from one person to many people? Why is it that this particular someone not learning something results in many people never developing skills? There is flawed reasoning here. Therefore, to correct it and to remove the logical fallacy, we have to keep the sentence as specific as it was from the beginning.
Hence, it should be that "If someone refuses to learn how to do something, that person will never develop new skills, and will struggle to get through life".
The correct answer about The origin of the game of chess :
Chess theory didn't advance much until the middle of the 18th century. a work published in 1749 by the French Master Francois-Andre Philidor. It also includes Philidor's renowned defense. This book discussed various avant-garde opening ideas, like as the defense that bears his name to this day. The famous Philidor quote, "The pawns are the spirit of chess," was originally used in this book.
Chess grew in popularity over the world, and chess sets were standardized in the middle of the 19th century. Chess sets were not uniform at all prior to the 1850s. Nathaniel Cooke's new kind of pieces was first launched in 1849 by the game and toy maker Jaques of London. The best player of his era, Howard Staunton, recommended these exact pieces. The Staunton pattern, a brand-new set of chess pieces, quickly gained popularity and was used in clubs and competitions all over the world. The Staunton pieces—and slightly modified versions of them—remain the norm for competitive chess sets.
To learn more about chess refer the link:
brainly.com/question/14974292
#SPJ9
The answer is A. Hope this helps!
Answer:
Persuasive speeches are designed to convince the audience that a certain viewpoint is correct. In doing so, the speaker may utilize information.
Explanation:
Informative (or informational) and persuasive speaking are related, but distinct, types of speeches. The difference between the two lies in the speaker’s end goal and what the speaker wants the audience to leave with. Informative speeches are probably the most prevalent variety of speech. The goal is always to supply information and facts to the audience. This information can come in the form of statistics, facts, or other forms of evidence. Informational speeches do not tell people what to do with the information; their goal is for the audience to have and understand the information. Academic lectures are often informational speeches, because the professor is attempting to present facts so the students can understand them. Informational speeches may have a tendency to become overdrawn and boring. Their goal is not to excite the audience members, but rather to provide them with knowledge they did not have before the speech. Like informational speeches, persuasive speeches use information. However, persuasive speeches are designed for the audience to not only hear and understand the information, but to use it to be convinced of a viewpoint. The end goal of a persuasive speech is not for the audience to have information, but rather for them to have a certain view. Persuasive speeches may use some of the same techniques as informational speeches, but can also use emotions to convince the audience. A sales pitch is one example of a persuasive speech. A common cry against certain persuasive speeches is that they rely too much on emotion and not enough on facts. A persuasive speech that succeeds in convincing the audience to accept a view but is based on faulty or misleading information is unethical.