Renaissance became a turning point in the South of Europea that later spread to the whole continent. It had a philosophical as well as social, scientific and cultural connotation where old Medieval thought was finally no longer legitimate. It is most known for the representations in the art with the works of the Italian artists, however, we need to recognize it drove the emerging model of the economy at the time (known today as mercantilism) and also regained lost Greek and Ancient cultures knowledge that formerly was prohibited by the Catholic church.
Europeans engaging in the Renaissance became much more centered on the human aspects of life and still continued to practice religion but the former institutions from the Catholic church were significantly diversified into other Institutions, While the Reformation was an effort to reform the current state of situations in Christianity led by Luther, it especially further led to a time of economic progress and cultural development. It became one of the leading social movements that spread across the north of Europe. The people identifying with Reformation ideas began to develop a new way of economic life privileging money savings. This new change on paradigm brought salvation and prosperity towards the common European peoples. The Protestant Ethic and Spirit of Capitalism is a study of the relationship between the ethics of Reformation and the emergence of the spirit of the modern capitalism.
Answer:
Britain had an elite society that welcomed industrialization while Russia did not.
Explanation:
British elites were open to the idea of investing into railways and factories. Politically, the British also had a parliament that allowed some form of representation in the government. There was also no more serfdom at the time of industrialization in the early 1800s. On the other hand, Russian elites were very opposed to investing or industrialization as this could threaten their wealth that they already accumulated. Serfdom was still legal in Russia until March 3 1861 when Alexander II abolished it, which meant that many peasants were tied to the land and could not migrate to urban areas. Furthermore, Russia was fully autocratic unlike Britian and only saw the implementation of a parliament in 1905. All of this meant that Britain's industrialization was very quick and significantly earlier than Russia's.
Answer:
Following enclosure, crop yields and livestock output increased while at the same time productivity increased enough to create a surplus of labor. The increased labor supply is considered one of the factors facilitating the Industrial Revolution.
An understanding of the Enclosure Acts is necessary to place aspects of the Industrial Revolution in their proper context. The Industrial Revolution is often accused of driving poor laborers en masse out of the countryside and into urban factories, where they competed for a pittance in wages and lived in execrable circumstances.
In turn, the palpable misery of this class fueled the rise of a vigorous socialist movement that blamed the Industrial Revolution for the exploitation of the masses. (The socialists were aware of the impact of enclosure but ultimately blamed industrialization.) And exploitation by industrialists undoubtedly existed; for one thing, some used governmental means. But the masses were there to be exploited largely because powerful land owners had used political means to deny to peasants their traditional rural livelihood. Exploitation was possible because other opportunities had been legally denied.
It would be deceptively simplistic to blame the Enclosure Acts alone for the impoverishment usually ascribed to the Industrial Revolution. Many factors were in play. For example, the majority of people in pre-Industrial England dwelt in the countryside, where they often supplemented their income through cottage industries, especially the weaving of wool. This income evaporated with the advent of cheap cotton and industrialized methods of weaving it. Many influences contributed to the desperation of an unemployed army of workers.
What enclosure does illustrate without question, however, is that the abuses ascribed to the Industrial Revolution are far from straightforward. Blaming industrialization for workers’ misery is not merely simplistic, it is also often incorrect. Whether or not some exploitation would have existed within free-market industrialization, the abuses of the Industrial Revolution were standardized, institutionalized, and carried to excess by government and the use of the political means.
(The tenants displaced by the process often left the countryside to work in the towns. This contributed to the Industrial Revolution – at the very moment new technological advances required large numbers of workers, a concentration of large numbers of people in need of work had emerged; the former country tenants and their descendants became workers in industrial factories within cities.)
Explanation:
Senators cannot ignore their constituents, however, as one-third of the Senate ... How do the different chamber sizes in the House
Answer:i think undermine
Explanation:bc my road still isnt fixed lol
