Answer:
Practically the entirety of the cases that the Supreme Court hears are cases that are on allure. The Supreme Court has unique purview over a not many cases, however these are very uncommon. This implies that the Supreme Court is quite often hearing situations where just matters of law are at issue (instead of issues of certainty). The Supreme Court is essentially, in those cases, attempting to choose if the law (regardless of whether rule law or the Constitution) has been effectively applied.
Explanation:
Cases heard by the Supreme Court for the most part include significant and troublesome issues of law. Cases that are not significant, or where the law is self evident, don't make it as far as possible up the stepping stool to the Supreme Court.
Thus, the cases the Court hears are those that include significant and troublesome inquiries of law. It hears those cases either after they have come up through the government court framework or after they have been chosen by the high court of a state.
The idea of democracy has survived war and oppression because is ideally based on a solid fundamental design. Democracy allows people to determine their political fate by giving them the opportunity to choose their leaders in an election. As such, it allows people to largely control themselves
The reason why northeners did not want to divide Nebraska thru the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was because they believde in the Missouri Compromise of 1820. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, allowed the people living in the territory of Kansas and Nebraska to whether or not allow slavery in their territory while the Missouri Comprise of 1820 is an act that abolishes slavery. Many northeners despised slavery while most southerners were advocates of pro-slavery. Because of this situation, it came to a point where people from both north and south parts started war with each other, which ended to "Bleeeding Kansas"
