Answer:
Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution provides that the President shall appoint officers of the United States “by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate.” This report describes the process by which the Senate provides advice and consent on presidential nominations, including receipt and referral of nominations, committee practices, and floor procedure.
Committees play the central role in the process through investigations and hearings. Senate Rule XXXI provides that nominations shall be referred to appropriate committees “unless otherwise ordered.” Most nominations are referred, although a Senate standing order provides that some “privileged” nominations to specified positions will not be referred unless requested by a Senator. The Senate rule concerning committee jurisdictions (Rule XXV) broadly defines issue areas for committees, and the same jurisdictional statements generally apply to nominations as well as legislation. A committee often gathers information about a nominee either before or instead of a formal hearing. A committee considering a nomination has four options. It can report the nomination to the Senate favorably, unfavorably, or without recommendation, or it can choose to take no action. It is more common for a committee to take no action on a nomination than to reject a nominee outright.
???????
By the time Rome was emerging as the great ancient Western power Babylon was practically in ruins.
The last time the rivalry determined a Big Ten Conference champion was in 1962 when #3 Wisconsin defeated #5 Minnesota for a berth to the 1963 Rose Bowl. Wisconsin won 14 straight meetings against Minnesota, from 2004 to 2017, before the Gophers beat the Badgers in their 2018 matchup.
The correct answer for the given question above would be option D. The statement that is an example of a historical argument would be this: <span> Rome collapsed because of internal weaknesses, not because of attacks from foreign invaders. When we say argument, this means that it is a set of propositions made to show that a particular conclusion is true. It is not simply a statement of opinion, but rather an attempt to give reasons. Hope this answer helps.</span>
If by "taxes people the highest" you mean that more people are paying, or that people are paying more... I'd say democracy. After all, the government establishes that people are the same and equally matters, <em>in theory, at least</em>.
Following this basic idea, people seem as equals, so they must pay taxes equally, right? What happens with poor people whom can't afford those values? The solution, also inserts in the democratic system, is the isonomy principle, that guarantee equality of citizens treating them according to their necessities.
