Question: The Founders of the United States gave much consideration to the division of responsibility between federal and state governments. They strove to strike a balance between an overbearing central government (such as the British government that had ruled them before the Revolution) and an over reliance on local governments (such as the structure of US government under the Articles of Confederation). Many citizens today continue to debate the correct balance between federal and state government.
What is your position? Name some areas of conflict where you think the powers are improperly balanced. Name some areas where you think the balance works well.
Explanation:
When the framers designed the US Constitution they did not give the Federal government much power so power was balanced between States and Central Government. But the Federal government has gained more and more power over time. At the same time, the States were restricted over the years, when the Framers did not imagine doing so. Both of these situations can be good or bad.
For example, making the States respect the Bill of Rights was a good thing when individuals had their basic rights stripped on a State level. So making only the Federal government respect the Bill of Rights did not make much sense. At the same time, the Federal Government has shown much power that was not designed and showed a few issues over the years, especially with the Executive Branch that had in a few opportunities overstepped its powers.
Answer:
The speaker states we’ve overlooked a major resource in efforts to reduce poverty. What is that resource? Why do you think this resource was overlooked?The overlooked resource is the people that are poor, I think this resource was overlooked because the people who are poor and have low income are typically discriminated against and considered less than if they had money.2.
Explanation:
The speaker shares a number of personal stories. What are some of the similarities or connecting points between the different stories the speaker shares?All of the stories are connected by people who have low income and prospectively harder lives, working to better themselves. The creative ways that people with lower incomes come together as a community to lift others up and help better each other. 3. The speaker mentions some problems that affect people living in poverty, and more specifically black, indigenous, and
Answer:
Plessy v. Ferguson
Explanation:
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark ruling of the United States Supreme Court in 1896 that provided legal justification for segregation and upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws on buses, public facilities etc.
This case came as a result of an incident in which an African American train passeger Homer Plessy refused to sit in the black only section of the train. Plessy argue that segregation law violate the Equal Proctection Clause of th Fourteenth Amendment which forbids states from denying any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. However Ferguson ruled that separate but equal facilities were constitutional.
Ferguson stand came to be known as separate but equal doctrine
Supreme Court Of The United States. U.S. Reports: Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 . 1895.
1.) Bill of Rights
2.) Amendments
3.) <span>Separation of Powers</span>
4.) Veto
5.) Governor
Hope this helps,
♥<span><em>A.W.E.<u>S.W.A.N.</u></em></span>♥
Answer:
Safavids launched a religious and missionary campaign to convert what was then a predominantly Sunni population by persuasion and by force.
hope it helps!
