The purpose of verification, as a normal motion, is to become aware of the faults/defects introduced at the time of any transformation of inputs into outputs.
Verification is a pleasant manage technique that determines if a machine meets its gadget-stage necessities. Inspection and demonstration is the principle testing technique used in Verification.
The Verification procedure offers the evidence that the gadget or machine detail plays its meant capabilities and meets all performance requirements listed inside the machine overall performance specification and functional and allotted baselines.
Learn more about verification method here:brainly.com/question/14513832
#SPJ4
Answer:
The company’s cash flows from operating activities was a cash inflow of $5,000
Explanation:
Cash at the end of the year = Cash at the beginning of the year + Net cash inflows from investing activities + Net cash inflows from financing activities + Net cash inflows from operating activities
Therefore,
Net cash inflows from operating activities = Cash at the beginning of the year + Net cash inflows from investing activities + Net cash inflows from financing activities - Cash at the end of the year = $340,000 + $40,000 + $45,000 - $420,000 = $5,000 >0
The company’s cash flows from operating activities was a cash inflow of $5,000
Total No of Units=12600+23400
=36000 units
Ski=12600/36000=35%
Snorkel=23400/36000=65%
Answer:
d. buyback
Explanation:
The scenario that is being described is a form of countertrade known as buyback. There are two reasons why this usually happens. The first is that the manufacturing company has limited access to liquid funds in the country which they are currently located and the goods provide better value. The second circumstance would be that they believe that the product being produced will increase in value and their profits will increase by holding the product as opposed to liquid funds.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option B, Judge's own personal feelings about the internet.
Explanation:
When a case comes to a court, it is the responsibility of a judge to see every aspect of the case and analyze it on the basis of given evidence or set rules or standards, or in the light of decisions made on the same case by other courts. But in this question, it is said that the case which was brought to the court was the first in its kind, it means no such type of case has been ever submitted in any court before. The freedom of speech on internet is a sensitive issue. So all aspects should be kept in mind while proceeding the case, and it would not be considered proper for the judge to bring his person feelings about the internet into the case. His personal feelings should be set aside and the case should be solved on the basis of evidences and solid views.
