I believe this depends solely on personal preference. A work of literature that you like may not be good to somebody else, so the way you feel about something makes it either good or bad. I believe I am pretty comfortable determining the quality of literature given that I have read a lot of books and have an overall grasp of each literary era throughout history. It can be easy to critique a text if you are knowledgeable enough about that particular era, style of writing, and general context, but it could also be quite difficult depending on the topic of that work.
The correct answer is the word Skimp instead "Skim"
Explanation:
In language, whether it is written or oral language error can emerge from the speaker or writer not following the grammar rules (grammar error), writing words incorrectly (spelling error), using punctuation marks incorrectly or avoiding using them when necessary (punctuation error), among others. In the case of "Here's why you should skip the skimp milk and go for whole milk instead" the type of error is a spelling one, which means words are not written correctly as the letters in words are not organized correctly or include letters that are supposed to be there. In this sentence the word Skimp refers to the word "Skim" that means to remove what is in the surface in the case of skim milk as fat is removed from it and not to the word Skimp that refers to avoid spending something, this means there is a spelling error as the writer added a "p" at the end of the word which is not correct and thus, the mistake is the word "Skimp" instead of skim.
Answer:
sure why not, if you have discord we can talk thrre
there mother stayed behind to her ailing baby.
