1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Karolina [17]
3 years ago
14

How could the video give citizens a more favorable opinion of kennedy?

History
2 answers:
igor_vitrenko [27]3 years ago
7 0

In the video, Nixon appeared to be nervous and uncomfortable. Those who listened to the debate on the radio would not have seen this as clearly. On the other hand, Kennedy appeared to be confident and comfortable, and he spoke clearly while focusing on the camera.

is actually the right answer i just took the test

Ierofanga [76]3 years ago
5 0
The video could give the citizens a more favorable opinion of Kennedy for it gave them a different look to the personality of Kennedy and also gained the citizens' approval because of his stated ideas and agreements in the video. 
You might be interested in
Which famous Muslim explorer traveled from northern Africa across Asia to China and back, stopping many places along the way?
Vaselesa [24]
Ibn Battuta, hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Someone help please.
tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

1830-1860. Have a nice day :-)

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
4. In a short paragraph, describe the transition of Rome from a republic to an empire. What was the republic like, and what caus
postnew [5]

Answer:

Over a period of nearly 200 years, however, the plebeians fought for and gained power within the government.

At the heart of the Roman Republic was the Senate. The Senate advised on matters pertaining to rules governing the city and population. In the republic, members of the patrician class served as advisers to the other governing bodies of the republic. Although the Senate did not formally make laws, the prestige of its members gave the Senate great influence over Rome’s law-making bodies.

The Senate lasted as a sole governing body for the republic for only a brief time, lasting from the republic’s founding in 509 B.C.E. until 494 B.C.E., when a strike orchestrated by the plebeians resulted in the establishment of the Concilium Plebis, or the Councilof the Plebs. This gave the plebeians a voice in the government. As a result, new legislative, or law-making, bodies of the Roman Republic were formed. Called assemblies, these legislative bodies shared power in the following ways:

           Comitia Centuriata — This body decided about war, passed laws, elected magistrates (consuls, praetors, and censors), considered appeals of capital convictions, and conducted foreign relations.

           Concilium Plebis — This body elected its own officials and formulated decrees for observance by the plebeian class; in 287 B.C.E., it gained the power to make all decrees binding for the entire Roman community.

           Comitia Tributa — The tribal assemblies, open to all citizens (who only could be free, adult males), elected minor officials, approved legislative decisions often on local matters, and could wield judicial powers but could only levy fines rather than administer punishment.

Leading the republic were two consuls who were elected by legislative assemblies. They served for one year, presided over the Roman Senate, and commanded the Roman military. Though their power was somewhat limited by the establishment of other magistrate positions, the consuls were effectively the heads of state.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
I need help please!!!!!
Otrada [13]
It marked the turning point because it’s a union battle and it would be a win for the north not the south.

Hope this helps.
6 0
3 years ago
Gandhi used this type of warfare to defeat the British?​
Gelneren [198K]

In 1914, Gandhi returned to India and lived a life of abstinence and spirituality on the periphery of Indian politics. He supported Britain in the First World War but in 1919 launched a new satyagraha in protest of Britain’s mandatory military draft of Indians. Hundreds of thousands answered his call to protest, and by 1920 he was leader of the Indian movement for independence. Always nonviolent, he asserted the unity of all people under one God and preached Christian and Muslim ethics along with his Hindu teachings. The British authorities jailed him several times, but his following was so great that he was always released.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLZZZ HELP I'LL GIVR U A MEDAL N FAN U
    13·1 answer
  • When the United States entered WW1 who did they assist
    8·1 answer
  • The Old Southwest:
    8·1 answer
  • How did Washington convince the southern states to accept the compromise
    14·1 answer
  • Help pls!!!
    13·2 answers
  • 5 Que<br>es el patriranio moraterial​
    12·1 answer
  • Who was the Muslim to form the concept of algebra?
    14·1 answer
  • 6.
    11·2 answers
  • 5) Where did Italy invade? Why did Italy invade this place? What were the outcomes/impacts of this invasion? Why might this have
    7·1 answer
  • According to Anabaptist who should be Christians?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!