Answer:
1) B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s.
2) A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution table is shown below:
Last Digit Frequency
0 9
1 1
2 1
3 3
4 1
5 11
6 1
7 0
8 3
9 1
1. Based on the distribution table, we see a very disproportionate distribution. There is a high frequency of 0's and 5's. This lays credence to the heights being reported rather than measured. As such, option B is the correct answer
<u>B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s</u>.
2. Since the heights were reported and not measured, they are most certainly not accurate. The conclusion is that the result is not accurate. As such, option A is the correct answer
<u>A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported</u>.
the board would be 4.85 feet
Answer: 50 minutes
Step-by-step explanation: a quarter to 5 is always 15 minutes from 5, 4:45. So 5:35-4:45 is 50.
Answer:
C. It is not a good fit because there are no points on the line.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order for a line to be a good fit for a data set represented as a scatterplot, the line must follow the general trend of the data in the scatterplot. This line does not follow the general trend of the data on the scatterplot, thus option (C) is the best statement to describe the situation.
C. It is not a good fit because there are no points on the line.
