Answer:
The correct answer is Allow employees to particpate.
Explanation:
Following a strategy in which employee participation is promoted does not imply that all problems are delegated to them, or rather unimportant problems; It consists in the active intervention of workers when identifying, analyzing and solving problems that make it difficult to achieve business objectives. It is important that employees get involved in the challenges of the organization to which they belong, and in the same way that they feel satisfied by a positive performance, they must also be aware and persistent in the face of adverse situations that affect the performance of the company.
Answer:
Dr. Cr.
Work in process $73,000
Manufacturing overhead $13,000
Account Payable $86,000
Explanation:
The Direct cost are those which are directly attributable to the product or service under consideration. Indirect cost are those which cannot be directly assigned to product or service cost. All the direct cost is added to the work in process account and indirect cost are included in the manufacturing overhead account.
Answer: Option (d)
Explanation:
Under this case the write off will be as follow:
Debit Credit
Allowance for doubtful accounts 25,200
Accounts receivables 25,200
Here, in this case the Allowance for the doubtful accounts and Accounts receivables are further decreased as the outcome of the transaction made. Thus, there will be no further effect on working capital. Therefore the $30,000 that is bad debt would then be stated as the credit to allowance account. This will then decrease the working capital by $30,000.
Answer:
Explanation:
In my opinion, I would like to say that Clean Machines Company is correct. If you look at it this way, you'd see that there actually isn't any contract between Clean Machines Company and Dealer. When it came to about offers, the person offering is able to revoke an offer before the offer is even accepted. And he won't be held responsible unless of course, the offer is irrevocable. Then, to make the offer to be irrevocable, the Dealer then would have needed to prove that an option was present, or prove that the offer is was not able to be revoked due to UCC provision.
Answer:
One company pays 100%, the other re-reimburses 50%
Explanation:
If an environmental assessment found that the two companies share joint and several liability for a hazardous materials cleanup.
What could happen if the two of them don't agree to cooperate in the cleanup is that one of the companies will eventually settle the costs fully while the other party will have to reimburse the party that pays, 50%.
The paying company could make claims because the environmental impact assessment has already found both companies jointly liable. hence each company ought to jointly share the costs
