Answer:
your a very good friend :)
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
As with any author's decision to use 1st person, her intention most likely -- in this story -- was to get her readers to go along for the ride into madness and cultivate a certain amount of sympathy for the narrator and her plight. The constant use of "I" puts readers in the narrator’s head and allows them to empathize with her.
What bolded word (put "" around the word)
The point of view of<em> Romeo and Juliet</em> is the third person. The narrator-story-teller in the play does not tell the story throughout the play, we can observe him in the beginning and then he disappears. Therefore, it is wrong that the play is told from the first-person point of view.
Imply or implication shows the relationship between statements that is true and the other one draws the meaning from that. Therefore, it is not related to reading strategy.
