Answer:
a) It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.
Explanation:
A senator, near the end of his first six-year term and running for reelection, made the claim: "Citizens of our state are thriving. While national unemployment levels have remained high, our state unemployment rate has been at astonishingly low levels for eleven years running. Clearly, everyone in our state has benefitted from the economical packages I have introduced during my time in the Senate. Therefore, grateful citizens of our state ought to vote for my second term."
This argument is most vulnerable to what criticism? It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.The senator's argument says that the condition which is low unemployment in the state is the effect of his economic packages, but the condition existed before he ever had the chance to introduce those packages. That is the major flaw of this argument.
Answer:
Overbreadth Doctrine
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the resolution was unconstitutional under the First Amendment Overbreadth Doctrine. This doctrine protects against prohibiting behavior that is guaranteed by the constitution, such as freedom of speech. The airport making a "First Amendment-Free Zone" was unconstitutional under this doctrine.
A Hereditary Monarchy is a form of government that is passed down through family lineage.
Historically this is the most common type of monarchy and continues to exist in the modern day.
Answer: This is just a guess but maybe like if you have like thermal vision I guess-
Explanation: Well, DSM contains descriptions, symptoms, and other criteria for diagnosing mental disorders.. it's important because It provides a common language for clinicians to communicate about their patients and establishes consistent and reliable diagnoses that can be used in the research of mental disorders.. ❤️I hope this helps❤️
