Answer:
The way that these issues influenced exploration and colonization in North America was that their exploration was fueled by the desire to obtain more wealth, ,more power(politics), and to spread their religion. European nations established colonies in North America for this reasons.
Hope this helps!
mostly low plateau with deserts, rangelands and a fertile plain in the southeast; mountain ranges in the east and south-east. ... The geography of the continent is extremely diverse, ranging from the snow-capped mountains of the Australian Alps and Tasmania to large deserts, tropical and temperate forests.
hope it helps have a great day
Answer:
D. Articulate and appealing vision
Explanation:
Most of the time people that are in the throws of circumstances that are extremely uncomfortable are willing to listen to a promise. While a charismatic leader is one that needs to be eloquent and set an example to the followers and have a direct plan of action they must first come with a dream.
As an example Barrack Obama was the first "African American" president of the United States of America. He did not specifically fit the description of many as "African American" due to his parentage. His mother was Causation and his father was African and had never had any descendants that were slaves.
This, however, did not stop him from appealing to the minorities with the slogan "Yes, we can". This was eerily parallel to the spiritual hymn "We shall overcome someday". The dream of the U.S.A.'s first black president was a tangible reality.
This is not to say that he was not competent for the job but first appealing to a dream is the beginning of the win for the favor of the people.
It means the personal freedom to follow whatever religion you choose, or
NO religion if that's your choice, in any way you want as long as you don't
bother other people, without any interference from laws or other people,
and without any penalty or discrimination no matter what your choice is.
That seems like such common sense that it's hard to understand that
in huge parts of the world, that's not the way it is at all.
Answer:
10
Explanation:
In 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed that in determining any risk, regulators should assume children have 10 times the exposure risk of adults to cancer-causing chemicals. Some health scientists contends that these guidelines are too weak. They suggest that, to be on safe side, we should assume that the risk of harm from toxins is 100 times that of adults. Others support doing this on ethical grounds, they say it is wrong not to give children much greater protection from harmful chemicals in the environment.
