All categories

3 years ago

Should the government place a special tax on fast food? eng4uv

1 answer:

8 0

This is an opinion question, so here is what I would answer with:

The government should not place special taxes on fast food as it is how some people survive. People with low income cannot simply run to the grocery store and get everything to make a burger and fries. They must rely on large fast food chains to give them healthy, enough, food for survival.

OR...

The government should place special taxes on fast food. This would increase the prices on foods sold. This said pricing could detour the public to making healthier, cheaper food choices.

You might be interested in

Robert is 15 years old and does not identify with his biological sex. although there is some controversy about the classificatio

lions [1.4K]

The current DSM-IV would categorize Robert into the category of Gender Identity Disorder. There are two main identification points of the same: the opinion that a person is of other sex, and a persistent and strong gross-gender identification. The person is usually not comfortable with her own gender and behaves opposite.

7 0

3 years ago

Write a detailed entry about racial inequality

Kobotan [32]

Answer:

Explanation:

racial inequality is not necessarily the same thing as racism, though the two do often go hand in hand. Perhaps it would be fair to say that racism is defined by a prejudice towards a group of people based on their race or ethnicity, and racial inequality is the result of that prejudice. For example, while it would be hard to point towards the racism of any one individual to account for the disparity between wealth in white families, and wealth in black families, it is nevertheless certainly an example of racial inequality. The fact that average black people have less money than white people is very plainly a result of lack of opportunity.

After all, we know quite plainly that while western culture (particularly the United States) values the “pull yourself up by the bootstraps narrative”, it is ultimately usually generational wealth that wins the day.

The racial inequality, in this case, is a result of the fact that African Americans started as slaves in this country, and then suffered through Jim Crowe laws, and other circumstance that contributed to a difficulty in establishing a foothold in prosperous circumstance.

It is important to note that situations of racial inequality do not necessarily pertain to every member of a given race. For example, not all African Americans struggle economically, and not all Caucasians prosper financially. In fact, there are countless examples of each case where the exact opposite is true. When people refer to racial inequality, they are talking about patterns that all too often manifest themselves in our society.

7 0

2 years ago

The woman's rights activists say victims are not getting justice. Why do you think they are not getting justice?

inn [45]

Yes we are innocent always and sad took seriously is b

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Hurry!!! In 1922 the ______________ was $70 billion; by 1929 it had risen to $100 billion.??

Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

Gross National Product (GNP)

4 0

2 years ago

Identify which alternative hypotheses regarding the presence of platyrrhines in south america are supported by available evidenc

Savatey [412]

The hypotheses regarding the presence of platyrrhines in south america that are supported by available evidence are:

Platyrrhines evolved from an anthropoid in Africa that migrated south (mainly) on land to Antarctica and then to Patagonia, at the southern tip of South America.

Platyrrhines evolved from an African anthropoid and migrated across the Atlantic to South America.

This hypothesis is supported by the striking similarities among Old World and New World higher primates. During the Eocene, when the weather was much warmer and dryer, migration would have been possible. This hypothesis is supported by evidence.

Beginning in the late Eocene, there were early anthropoids in Africa that predated platyrrhines but looked strikingly similar to the ﬁrst platyrrhines in South America. This resemblance suggests that platyrrhines evolved in Africa before arriving in South America.

The question seems incomplete. The complete question is:

The following are alternative hypotheses regarding the presence of platyrrhines in South America. Which of these is/are supported by available evidence?

Platyrrhines evolved from an African anthropoid and migrated across the Atlantic to South America.

Platyrrhines evolved from an anthropoid in Africa that migrated south (mainly) on land to Antarctica and then to Patagonia, at the southern tip of South America.

Platyrrhines evolved from a North American anthropoid, then migrated to South America in the late Oligocene.

Old World and New World anthropoids evolved independently from different lineages in Africa and South America, respectively.

Know more about platyrrhines here

brainly.com/question/28941791

#SPJ4

8 0

1 year ago