Answer:
cannot be provided to one person without making it available to others as well.
Explanation:
A public good is a good that is non excludable and non rivalrous. It cannot be provided to one person without making it available to others as well. If one person is using it, it does not stop other people from using it also. An example of a public good is roads.
Public goods contrasts with club goods and private goods
A club good is a type of public good. It is excludable but non-rivalrous. For example paid streaming services are an example of a club good. Those who do not subscribe are excluded from using the service. But all subscribers have equal assess to the service
A private good is a good that is excludable and rivalrous.e.g. a privately owned car
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
f a $100 drop in the price of a $10,000 car resulted in an increase in the quantity of cars purchased from 100 to 110 and a $100 drop in the price of a $1,000 vacation rental resulted in an increase in the quantity of weekly vacation homes rented from 100 to 110, the price elasticity of demand the same for both the car and the vacation rental.
The elasticity remains unchanged because the percentage change in price and percentage change in quantity are tne same in both cases.
The foreign policy actually used are largely dependent on a nation's foreign policy agenda.
1) Foreign Aid
2) Sanctions
3) Diplomacy
I hope that's help :0
A food surplus in a society can lead to many different things. But based on the principles of supply and demand a surplus of food should lead to a reduction in the price of food, because the quantity supplied is most likely higher than the quantity demanded. In addition a food surplus could lead a country or companies to sell their food surplus internationally or to "dump" the goods on another country or market by selling the goods for a very cheap price most likely lower than the price of the good in that market prior to the entry of this new producer or country with the food surplus.
Answer:
Because this transaction MEET the control of the corporation requirement, Janice has income of $0 and Thom has income of $
Explanation:
Based on the information we were told that Thom provide service that is worth $40,000 which means that the amount of $40,000 is Thom income but we were not told that Janice has an income, which means that Janice will have an income of $0.
Hence, Because this transaction MEET the control of the corporation requirement, Janice has income of $0 and Thom has income of $
40,000.
