Answer: the correct answer is B The statute is the least restrictive means of advancing the state's compelling interest in ending discrimination by groups using public facilities.
Explanation:
While schools are generally not public forums, they may become a designated public forum by being held open to student groups for meetings. In that case, the First Amendment may be violated if a college restricts use of its classrooms based on the content of a student group's speech.
To justify content-based regulation of otherwise protected speech, the government must show that the regulation is necessary to achieve a compelling state interest that cannot be satisfied by less restrictive means.
Similarly, the right to associate for expressive purposes is not absolute. At the very least, the right may be infringed to serve a compelling government interest, unrelated to the suppression of ideas, that cannot be achieved through means significantly less restrictive of associational freedoms.
Some Hispanics in the United States do not feel that they are unfairly construed as immigrants, when in fact many of them have lived in what is now the United States for longer than the U.S. has existed.Many Hispanics in New Mexico, for instance can trace their ancestry to Spanish settlements established in the late 1500s, long before the United States existed and a hundred years before the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth. Some Hispanics in Texas argue that they were living peacefully in that land as Mexican citizens until Anglo-Americans forcefully seized Texas from Mexico in the Texas War of Independence
<span>Latin american deforestation differs from other parts of the world. In Latin America, companies are often looking for space to grow commercial farms or cheap land for manufacturing. In others parts of the world, companies are looking for oil, mining diamonds, or causing deforestation for profit.</span>
Answer:
C. Keeping the lab neat and organized
Explanation:
Most reasonable answer¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Could a modern president run a government with five cabinet members as Goerge Washington did?
No, of course not. It would be impossible. The reason is that times have changed, the number of people has dramatically increased, necessities are different, and we are living in a completely different world that needs specializations for different areas.
Does a president today need 15 cabinet members?
Yes, probably more, because I have mentioned above, the government faces different responsibilities and conditions that required the specialization of different cabinet members. Internal affairs, the economy of the US, US Politics, social issues are more diverse and complicated than before. Foreign relations are also a critical issue that requires the focus and attention of experts that did not exist in the past.
