1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ss7ja [257]
3 years ago
8

Explain how international-organization membership and participation in international treaties affect national sovereignty. Also,

consider: how is the definition of sovereignty changing in a globalized world?
History
1 answer:
spayn [35]3 years ago
7 0
Membership to international organizations have been criticized by several nationalists as it helps other countries interfere with internal decisions and policies, thereby eroding the sovereignty of such a country to act independently.
sovereignty of a nation however is a fluid concept, and with the onset of globalization international forces are forever competing with domestic interests. such areas where Sovereignty of several nations have been tested includes military practices,climate issues, energy uses, and the concepts of rights,freedoms and justice.
<span />
You might be interested in
" Goodness can never be de<br>the story The Happy<br>Prince.<br><br>destroyed". Explain in 150<br>​
Anton [14]

Answer:

An angle came up from the heaven and took the swallow and the prince to the heaven where they both leaved in peace. Though the body of the prince and the swallow got destroyed their lives became eternal. Hence it can be concluded that goodness can never be destroyed

Explanation:

by Punith Reddy

3 0
3 years ago
Effects of the Cuban Revolution on the Caribbean
Komok [63]

Impact of the Cuban Revolution

By most social and economic indicators, Cuba by mid-century was among Latin America’s most highly developed countries. However, in the postwar period it was afflicted with lacklustre economic growth and a corrupt political dictatorship set up in 1952 by the same Batista who earlier had helped put his country on a seemingly democratic path. It was also a country whose long history of economic and other dependence on the United States had fed nationalist resentment, although control of the sugar industry and other economic sectors by U.S. interests was gradually declining. While conditions for revolutionary change were thus present, the particular direction that Cuba took owed much to the idiosyncratic genius of Fidel Castro, who, after ousting Batista at the beginning of 1959, proceeded by stages to turn the island into the hemisphere’s first communist state, in close alliance with the Soviet Union.

The Cuban Revolution achieved major advances in health and education, though frankly sacrificing economic efficiency to social objectives. Expropriation of most private enterprise together with Castro’s highly personalistic dictatorship drove many members of the middle and upper classes into exile, but a serious decline in productivity was offset for a time by Soviet subsidies. At the same time, thanks to its successful defiance of the United States—which tried and failed to overthrow it by backing a Cuban exiles’ invasion in April 1961—and its evident social advances, Castro’s Cuba was looked to as a model throughout Latin America, not only by established leftist parties but also by disaffected students and intellectuals of mainly middle-class origin.

Over the following years much of Latin America saw an upsurge of rural guerrilla conflict and urban terrorism, in response to the persistence of stark social inequality and political repression. But this upsurge drew additional inspiration from the Cuban example, and in many cases Cuba provided training and material support to guerrillas. The response of Latin American establishments was twofold and eagerly supported by the United States. On one hand, governments strengthened their armed forces, with U.S. military aid preferentially geared to counterguerrilla operations. On the other hand, emphasis was placed on land reform and other measures designed to eliminate the root causes of insurgency, all generously aided by the United States through the Alliance for Progress launched by President John F. Kennedy.

Even though much of the reactive social reformism was cosmetic or superficial, the counterrevolutionary thrust was nonetheless generally successful. A Marxist, Salvador Allende, became president of Chile in 1970, but he did so by democratic election, not violent revolution, and he was overthrown three years later. The only country that appeared to be following the Cuban pattern was Nicaragua under the Sandinista revolutionary government, which in the end could not withstand the onslaughts of its domestic and foreign foes. Moreover, the Cuban Revolution ultimately lost much of its lustre even in the eyes of the Latin American left, once the collapse of the Soviet Union caused Cuba to lose its chief foreign ally. Although the U.S. trade embargo imposed on Cuba had been a handicap all along, shortages of all kinds became acute only as Russian aid was cut back, clearly revealing the dysfunctional nature of Castro’s economic management.

Political alternatives

Movement toward democracy

The Latin American countries that did not opt for the Cuban model followed widely varying political paths. Mexico’s unique system of limited democracy built around the Institutional Revolutionary Party was shaken by a wave of riots in the summer of 1968 on the eve of the Olympic Games held in Mexico City, but political stability was never seriously in doubt. A somewhat analogous regime was devised in Colombia as a means of restoring civilian constitutional rule after a brief relapse in the mid-1950s into military dictatorship: the dominant Liberal and Conservative parties chose to bury the hatchet, creating a bipartisan coalition (called the National Front) whereby they shared power equally between themselves while formally shutting out any minor parties. Once this arrangement expired in 1974, Colombia became again a more conventional political democracy, such as Costa Rica had been since before 1950 and Venezuela became in 1958 after the overthrow of its last military dictator.

 

 

 

 

 

3 0
3 years ago
Agricultural Revolution had what results?
Rama09 [41]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Agricultural Revolution of the 18th century paved the way for the Industrial Revolution in Britain. New farming techniques and improved livestock breeding led to amplified food production. This allowed a spike in population and increased health. The new farming techniques also led to an enclosure movement.

3 0
3 years ago
As a result of the U.S. Mexican War,the southern boundary of Texas was-
Alexus [3.1K]

Answer: The war officially ended with the February 2, 1848, signing in Mexico of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Mexico gave up all claims to Texas and recognized the Rio Grande as America's southern boundary.

Explanation: Hope this helped!! :D

4 0
3 years ago
AKS 54.c: In which Asian nation do the people play the GREATEST role in deciding who the rulers are and what decisions are made?
Artist 52 [7]

A : south korea

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The purpose of deinstitutionalization is to
    15·2 answers
  • When ww2 began, which country controlled korea
    10·2 answers
  • Which was a result of the Protestant Reformation in Europe?
    6·2 answers
  • What does KKK stand for
    8·2 answers
  • Which british act was most offensive
    6·1 answer
  • 64 points If you do my essay I’ll pay pal you 20 bucks which is half my money because I’m broke
    9·1 answer
  • Explain the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 to your best ability.
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best completes the diagram?
    12·2 answers
  • Explain how scientific and technological innovations (e.g., the steam engine, new textile technology, steel processing, medical
    10·2 answers
  • Other than court of appeals,which court can send cases directly to the U.S supreme court?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!