The United States Bill of Rights could be looked at as a newly
independent adaption of the English Bill of Rights as it is directly
derivative in nature and function. Both documents are amendments initially overlooked by original copies of governing documentation.
The question doesn't really make sense, science cannot be debunked with facts because science aims to hypothesize, test, and draw conclusions based off evidence, which has told us what is factual and what is not for the entirety of out existence. How can science even be "wrong" in the way you are putting it? For science as a whole to be wrong would mean we couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy whatsoever. Science isn't wrong if it disproves or discredits someone's beliefs, it is just labeled as biased by the same people who have lived their whole lives believing in a God without ever stopping to think that they might be wrong.
Answer:
They bacically made sure ht enative americans didn't do anything wrong.
<span>Floods provided water for crops.
Rate 5 stars if you felt this answer helped please!</span>
