Answer:
Effects of the 1929 Stock Market Crash: The Great Depression
By 1933, nearly half of America's banks had failed, and unemployment was approaching 15 million people, or 30 percent of the workforce.
Explanation:
The American Revolutionary War (1775–1783), also known as the American War of Independence,was a war between Great Britain and its Thirteen Colonies in North America which declared independence in July 1776 as the United States of America.
Revolution means: "A forcible overthrow of the government or social order, in favor of a new government"
Answer: Revolution means many things such as overthrowing the government or social order to make a new government like the Americans did in The Revolutionary war. They fought against Britain because they wanted to be free have their own government and make their own laws.
Answer:
B. Disruptive innovation
Explanation:
A disruptive innovation is an innovation whose application affects how a market or industry functions significantly, it requires a major change in the way consumers live and creates a new market and value chain. Examples of disruptive innovation are; the internet, radio, smart phones, steel mini mills, etc.
Giyū Tomioka and he is from the anime “Demon Slayer”
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
