Match the fallacy with its name.
> Non Sequitur
"A conclusion or statement that does not logically follow from the previous argument or statement"
There is no logical connection to being able to be a strong Italian speaker because one speaks Spanish.
I think it's going to say like how the characters are feeling right now and how they talking like for example when your angry you talk
in a angry voice and
Answer:
Using binoculars, we saw three lion cubs
Explanation:
A misplaced modifier occurs when a word or a phrase is incorrectly placed in a sentence that separates it from the word it modifies, making the sentence have a different meaning.
Therefore, correcting the misplaced modifier in the sentence "We saw three lion cubs using binoculars", we change it to "Using binoculars, we saw three lion cubs"
This is because, from the first sentence, it seems like the cubs were using binoculars, when in actual sense, it was the speaker that used binoculars to see the cubs.
I would say that the best example of a hyperbole is <span>C. "Supposing that one thousand families in this city, would be constant customers for infants flesh . . . I compute that Dublin would take off annually about twenty thousand carcasses..." This is a gross exaggeration of the whole situation: not only would the nation be relieved of the great financial (and presumably moral) burden, but Dublin won't have to worry about 20 thousand carcasses that it now has to deal with. Infants won't die from malnutrition or disease; they will be eaten, thus improving sanitary conditions in Dublin.
</span>
An intransitive verb is an action verb<span>, expressing a doable activity like </span>arrive<span>, </span>go<span>, </span>lie<span>, </span>sneeze<span>, </span>sit<span>, </span>die<span>, etc. Unlike a </span>transitive verb<span>, it will </span>not<span> have a </span>direct object<span> receiving the action. Did and Attend are both words who are likely to have a direct object receiving the action; therefore they are likely transitive.</span>