Answer: Brutus is more naive, while Cassius is manipulative and deceitful.
Explanation:
Shakespeare's <em>Julius Caesar </em>portrays the moral dilemma of Brutus, Caesar's friend. He makes a decision to participate in a conspiracy to murder Caesar, led by Cassius.
Cassius and Brutus differ in that Cassius is cunning and corrupt, while Brutus is naive. Although both of them plot to kill Caesar, Cassius turns out to be more treacherous than Brutus. Brutus first hesitates to join the plot, but eventually joins because of his naivety. Cassius is, on the other hand, the one who initiates the murder plot, and is a quite manipulative character.
I'm not really surprised about what Jesus said about the scribes and the Pharisees because, according to what the Bible relates through the four gospels, which give great indications of the social form in the time of Jesus, people like the scribes and the Pharisees sought to enrich themselves by promulgating the word of God and only pretending.
The Pharisees, as Matthew 23:23 says, did not act with justice or mercy, therefore, I consider that Jesus simply told them something that corresponded to the truth of his hearts.
Very surely today people make mistakes, sometimes we are unjust, some other people are unfaithful or hypocritical, but perhaps what differentiates a current person from the Pharisees is that he does not regularly enact good works pretending to be holy (in most cases cases), but <u><em>we are aware that, as sinful people, we must consider our actions and expect to improve day after day</em></u>.
Personally, I seek the glory of God, because he is the one who has given us all the blessings that we currently enjoy and who protects us at all times, I feel protected knowing that God approves my way of acting.
If you want to know a little more about the justice promulgated in the bible, please visit the following link: brainly.com/question/18004918?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
jmhx.vbghcgzd mmcjLfotoyp
The result, called Mandate for Leadership, epitomized the intellectual ambition of the then-rising conservative movement. Its 20 volumes, totaling more than 3,000 pages, included such proposals as income-tax cuts, inner-city “enterprise zones,” a presidential line-item veto, and a new Air Force bomber.
Despite the publication's academic prose and mind-boggling level of detail, it caused a sensation. A condensed version -- still more than 1,000 pages -- became a paperback bestseller in Washington. The newly elected Ronald Reagan passed out copies at his first Cabinet meeting, and it quickly became his administration’s blueprint. By the end of Reagan’s first year in office, 60 percent of the Mandate’s 2,000 ideas were being implemented, and the Republican Party’s status as a hotbed of intellectual energy was ratified. It was a Democrat, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who would declare in 1981, “Of a sudden, the GOP has become a party of ideas.”
Answer:
c.they worked closely with the a
abbot design and build a church.
