What is the following may I ask? You can invest in real estate by either buying a property or buying into a real estate investment fund.
Answer:
a-1. Strictly considering tax factors, should Nitai work or repair his car if the $420 he must pay to have his car fixed is not deductible?
a-2. Given the answer in a-1 above, by how much is Nitai better or worse off?
- If Natia works during the weekend, he will have $42 more than if he repairs his car.
Explanation:
additional revenue generated by working on weekend = $525 x (1 - 12%) = $462
cost of repairing the car at Autofix = $420
net benefit of working during the weekend = additional revenue - cost of repairing the car at Autofix = $462 - $420 = $42
Answer: False
Explanation:
When the government subsidies production of a good, it leads to a rise in the supply of the good. The supply curve shifts down to the right leading to a <em>fall in the price level</em>. But the <em>equilibrium quantity increases</em>.
Thus, the given statement is false that if the government decides to subsidize the production of a good, the result would be a decrease in the equilibrium price and a decrease in the equilibrium quantity.
Increase output!!!!
little late but ...
Answer:
B) John can expect to earn $120,000 in revenue more by expanding, but that is less than the cost of expansion, $150,000.
Explanation:
If John decides not to expand his expected revenue will be = ($100,000 x 50%) + ($300,000 x 50%) = $50,000 + $150,000 = $200,000
If John decides to expand his expected revenue will be = ($100,000 x 30%) + ($300,000 x 30%) + ($500,000 x 40%) = $30,000 + $90,000 + $200,000 = $320,000
If John decides to expand, his revenue will increase by $120,000.
Since we are not told if John's revenue is yearly or not, I assume that it includes a whole business or project cycle. The cost of expanding is $150,000 while the incremental revenue is only $120,000.
