The type of externality where market equilibrium quantity produced will be more than socially optimal quantity in absence of governemtn intervention is Negative externality.
Let understand that whenever a production of good or service negatively affect the unrelated third party who is not directly involved in a market transaction, it is said that negative externality exists in the scenario.
A very good example of commonly cited Negative Externalities are air pollution and noise pollution which was caused during production an affects unrelated third party.
If there is presence of government intervention in the production, then, the production of goods or service will be halted.
Therefore, in conclusion, this type of externality is called the Negative Externality.
Read more about Negative Externality here
<em>brainly.com/question/13901028</em>
Answer:
Horizontal merger
Explanation:
An horizontal merger is a consolidation or merging of companies that are the same industry. Merging of companies in the same industry helps the companies to have a greater market share of the industry.
As seen in the question below, both companies are beer companies and are consolidating or merging to form the largest beer company in the world. This wold give them a global coverage as opposed to the few countries they were restricted to before the merger.
Cheers.
Answer and Explanation:
I will go through each and every option explaining the reasons and what option would be the best:
The (a) part says 'difference in wages will eventually disappear since a haircut is a homogeneous good' - This is not true because even though it is an homogeneous product, some customers do have a strong preference for barbers who are not going bald. Therefore, they know their worth and they would want to capitalize on that and get paid just a bit more than bald barbers.
The (b) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will be able to charge a higher price for a haircut to those consumers who have a strong preference for barbers with hair'. - If the barbershop charges higher price for barbers that have hair then the customers will prefer bald barbers as the questions mentions that there is high competition and since it is an homogeneous, customers would be willing to save money and get their haircut from some other barber.
The (c) part says 'barbershops that hire bald barbers will always be much more profitable' - Not necessarily. The reason is that some customers have a strong preference for barbers who are not bald and therefore, that would help barbershops who have barbers with hair to be a bit more profitable as some additional customers would want their services.
The (d) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will always be much more profitable' - This is the best option and the reason for it is because some customers have a strong preference for barbers with hair and that would help the barbershop to earn more. They would have the customers who already indifferent to whoever cuts their hair and in addition to that, they would also have the customers who have their preference.
Hence the answer is D.
I’m sure that it’s true you nerd
Decrease the supply of credit ...
