Answer: Option (C)
Explanation:
From the given options , we can state that Vince's behavior is the example of <em>conformity</em>. Conformity is referred to as the function of coordinating with perspective, faith, and also the behaviors of group norms or the politics. Norms are mostly known to be implicit, i.e. the specific set of rules which are mostly shared by the group of individuals, that tends to further guide their conversation with other individual.
Answer:
Explanation:
Full question
Blow up." Jeanie is hauling gas in the back of her pick-up truck for her personal watercraft. She is planning a lake party and thinks she will need a lot of it. On the way home, Jeanie stops at the automatic teller machine at her bank and exits her car. Holly pulls behind her and negligently rear-ends Jeanie's pick-up. The truck explodes and results in the bank building burning to the ground. The bank sues Holly for negligence claiming that Holly should have to pay for the entire bank building. The bank claimed that it should be able to recover under the res ipsa loquitur doctrine.
A. The bank is correct because under that doctrine defendants are liable for any harm caused.
B. The bank is correct only if Holly has sufficient insurance to cover the bank burning.
C. The bank is correct only if it can be established that Holly was a repeat driving offender.
D. The bank is incorrect because the issue here is causation, not whether there was a lack of due care.
E. The bank is incorrect because res ipsa loquitur is a defense.
The bank is incorrect because the issue here is causation, not whether there was a lack of due care. The bank should be more concerned about what caused the explosion which really had nothing to do with Holly but why did the pick-up truck explode. How does Holly parking her car at rear-ends of Jeanie's pick up cause an explosion due to negligence. What is the prove
The common law of negligence, the res ipsa loquitur doctrine states that a breach of a party's duty of care may be inferred from the events that occurred. In other words, the negligence is so noticeable that you can tell that someone had a negligent hand in what happened.
According to the question, the federalists believed that there was a need for a strong central government
The federalists were by Led by Alexander Hamilton. it was regarded as the first political party in the US. They were in support of the US Constitution.
The federalists attempted to influenced and convinced the state to ratify the constitution.
<h3>Further Explanation</h3>
Some of the stands of the federalists was that, there was no need for inclusion of the bill of right into the constitution.
Federalists were of the view that the bill of right would limit the right of the people by creating what they called "parchment barrier".
However, prominent members of the federalists including Hamilton, John Jay and James Madison hide under the pseudonym "Publius." to published series of essays to support their ground.
On 1787, fifty delegates came together at the constitutional convention to determine the best way to adjust the article of the confederation and came up with a new constitution.
After a thorough debate, there was a transition of articles of the federation to the United State constitution, but then without the bill of right.
The federalists want the document ratified without the bill of right while the anti-federalist believed the constitution concentrated too much power to the central government, and the people will be oppressed without the bill of right.
LEARN MORE:
KEYWORDS:
- the anti-federalists
- federalists
- central government
- constitution
- united states
