Answer:
The Mississippi River allowed quick transportation.
The field of Psychoneuroimmunology examines the relationships among psychological factors (such as copying, emotions, and beliefs), the nervous system, and the functioning of the immune system.
Psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) is a field that has advanced in the final forty years to have a look at the relationship between immunity, the endocrine device, and the relevant and peripheral frightened systems.
humans with breast, cervical, or ovarian cancer who said feeling harassed or lonely had abnormalities in their immune systems. communique between the immune system and brain can also impact signs and symptoms which can be related to most cancers treatment, along with fatigue, depression, and trouble snoozing.
Psychoneuroimmunology is the take a look at interactions between conduct, the mind, and the immune device.
Learn more about Psychoneuroimmunology here: brainly.com/question/1719210
#SPJ4
Charter means <span>a written grant by a country's legislative or sovereign power, by which an institution such as a company, college, or city is created and its rights and privileges defined. </span>
The paragraph most likely reflects that<u> </u><u>creating </u><u>the</u><u> Allen Coral Atlas</u><u> was a </u><u>collaborative effort.</u>
The Allen Coral Atlas is a map of the various coral reefs on Earth. It was mostly sponsored by Paul Allen who donated about $9 million to the initiative.
This does not mean that others did not contribute to the project as there were several significant contributors such as:
- <em>Arizona State University </em>
- <em>Planet Organization </em>
- <em>National Geographic Society </em>
- <em>University of Queensland </em>
There was also the immense work by Ruth Gate who was a coral expert.
In conclusion, we can say that creating the Allen Coral Atlas was a massive collaborative effort amongst various well meaning organizations.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/15794949.</em>
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
