It helped increase population. Before agriculture, people roamed around and
gathered what they could to survive.
Later on, they learned how to grow their plants and raise their own
livestock, they decided to settle down.
This led to the growth of communities and the start of civilization.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option B, Coalition Formation.
Explanation:
Coalition formation is simply the actions exerted by the group of people which put influence or pressure over someone or some decision.
So in this example, Krystal proposed a budgeting process to her boss which he rejected, but Krystal thinks that her proposal was simpler and fairer, so she presented the proposal to the heads of other departments who could get benefit from her new budgeting process proposal. They liked her proposal very much. Also some co workers liked her simple and fair budgeting process proposal. So here a group of people arose which was in favor of the new proposed process. When her boss came to know about it, he agreed to test her proposal in a pilot project. So this act of likeness by the key personnel of the company influence the behavior of the boss. Key personnel here act as the coalition. So Krystal used the Coalition formation of influence here.
The step that the laboratory has to take would be to ensure that there is a scheduled timing in the laboratory for all to follow.
<h3>What is the turnaround time?</h3>
This is defined as the amount of time that is used in an organization to show the time that is taken to finish work or to complete an order in the organization.
This is very important in the laboratory because it would help to take care of the issues that may arise where they are unable to meet with thge targets that they have set in the establishment.
Read more on turnaround time here:
brainly.com/question/1643608
#SPJ1
Answer: "Landrum-Griffin Act" .
________________________________________________
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
