1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergeu [11.5K]
3 years ago
5

Kim solved the equation below by graphing a system of equations. log base 2 (3x-1) = log base 4 (x+8)

Mathematics
2 answers:
kompoz [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

solution is

x=1.353,y=1.613

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given equation as

log_2(3x-1)=log_4(x+8)

Firstly, we will find equations

First equation is

y=log_2(3x-1)

Second equation is

y=log_4(x+8)

now, we can draw graph

and then we can find intersection point

we can see that

intersection point is (1.353,1.613)

so, solution is

x=1.353,y=1.613

ExtremeBDS [4]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The solution to the given equation is at point (1.353, 1.613).           Step-by-step explanation:

Given : Kim solved the equation below by graphing a system of equations.  

\log_2(3x-1)=\log_4(x+8)

To find : What is the approximate solution to the equation?

Solution :  

Let, y_1=\log_2(3x-1)

and  y_2=\log_4(x+8)

Now, we plot these two equations.

The graph of y_1=\log_2(3x-1) is shown with red line.

The graph of y_2=\log_4(x+8) is shown with blue line.

The solution to this system will be their intersection point.  

The intersection point of these graph is (1.353, 1.613)

Refer the attached graph below.

Therefore, The solution to the given equation is at point (1.353, 1.613).

You might be interested in
Use a proof by contradiction to show that the square root of 3 is national You may use the following fact: For any integer kirke
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

1. Let us proof that √3 is an irrational number, using <em>reductio ad absurdum</em>. Assume that \sqrt{3}=\frac{m}{n} where  m and n are non negative integers, and the fraction \frac{m}{n} is irreducible, i.e., the numbers m and n have no common factors.

Now, squaring the equality at the beginning we get that

3=\frac{m^2}{n^2} (1)

which is equivalent to 3n^2=m^2. From this we can deduce that 3 divides the number m^2, and necessarily 3 must divide m. Thus, m=3p, where p is a non negative integer.

Substituting m=3p into (1), we get

3= \frac{9p^2}{n^2}

which is equivalent to

n^2=3p^2.

Thus, 3 divides n^2 and necessarily 3 must divide n. Hence, n=3q where q is a non negative integer.

Notice that

\frac{m}{n} = \frac{3p}{3q} = \frac{p}{q}.

The above equality means that the fraction \frac{m}{n} is reducible, what contradicts our initial assumption. So, \sqrt{3} is irrational.

2. Let us prove now that the multiplication of an integer and a rational number is a rational number. So, r\in\mathbb{Q}, which is equivalent to say that r=\frac{m}{n} where  m and n are non negative integers. Also, assume that k\in\mathbb{Z}. So, we want to prove that k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Z}. Recall that an integer k can be written as

k=\frac{k}{1}.

Then,

k\cdot r = \frac{k}{1}\frac{m}{n} = \frac{mk}{n}.

Notice that the product mk is an integer. Thus, the fraction \frac{mk}{n} is a rational number. Therefore, k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Q}.

3. Let us prove by <em>reductio ad absurdum</em> that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is an irrational number. So, we have x is irrational and p\in\mathbb{Q}.

Write q=x+p and let us suppose that q is a rational number. So, we get that

x=q-p.

But the subtraction or addition of two rational numbers is rational too. Then, the number x must be rational too, which is a clear contradiction with our hypothesis. Therefore, x+p is irrational.

7 0
4 years ago
Without solving what can you tell about the solution
nlexa [21]

Answer:

n has to be negative

8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE I BEG ANYONE TO HELP ME ANWER THIS MATH QUESTION!!!
Rus_ich [418]
Its the first one.
Explanation: The equation equals x=3/5 and so does the first one.
5 0
3 years ago
R+3.2=6.1<br> What is the value of r? Show work
ankoles [38]
Hello,

The answer is 2.9.

Reason:

Solve this two ways:

1. You could be just regularly solving the question but subtracting 6.1 to 3.2.

6.1-3.2=2.9

2. Or you could be solving variable.

Subtract 3.2 on both sides:

6.1-3.2=2.9

r=2.9

If you need anymore help feel free to ask me!

Hope this helps!

~Nonportrit
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A fruit stand has to decide what to charge for their produce. They need $10 for 4 apples and 4 oranges.
Anestetic [448]
A works because 1 • 4 + 1.5 • 4 = 10 and 1 • 6 + 1.5 • 6 = 15
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In Exercise, simplify the expression. <br> eln 4
    5·1 answer
  • Have you ever seen rational exponents? Rational exponents are designed to fit within the properties of exponents. That is, (31/2
    6·2 answers
  • What is x- y- intercepts of the graph -4x+3y=12
    14·1 answer
  • Square root of -6 times square root of -12 times square root of -5
    11·1 answer
  • 4 ake away 2 times -1
    13·1 answer
  • Mr. Gregory drives a furniture delivery truck four days each week. The table shows the driving record for one week.
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following are vertical asymptotes of the function y=2cot3[x]+4 check all that apply
    13·2 answers
  • Does anyone know the answer??
    6·1 answer
  • Mrs. Malone earns two hours of paid
    6·2 answers
  • Can someone please help I will be giving Brainliest to whoever can answer :)
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!