A lot of people were excited that they made it home from the war alive. A ton had spouses and their spouses were super happy to. Many decided to have a baby.
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
Answer:
C. Representative economy
Explanation:
Representative money refers to something without any intrinsic value that can be used as a medium of exchange.
Even though that medium does not necessarily have intrinsic value, it can be considered something that desired when the majority of people in that society accepted it as a medium of exchange.
<u>In the example above,</u>
The certificate is just a piece of paper. Outside of the war period, that paper will have no value in that society.
But, during wartime people realized that they need to do something drastic to survive, so the majority of the people in that small country acknowledge that piece of paper as something valuable.
Answer:
D. The bad weather causes several guests to not feel well and the Pringles have to include some people who were not originally on the guest list.
The setting which affects the events of the story told in Fourteen and “The Dinner Party” was attributed to the bad weather causes several guests to not feel well and the Pringles have to include some people who were not originally on the guest list.
