1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
son4ous [18]
3 years ago
6

The New Deal could best be summarized as a program that

History
1 answer:
Bingel [31]3 years ago
6 0

The New Deal could best be summarized as a program that still has an impact on American life and government today.

Answer: Option C

<u>Explanation:</u>

When Mr Roosevelt took charge to stabilize the economy and provide employment New deal was introduced. Roosevelt’s new deal totally changed the federal government by expanding its scope. It was period of Great depression.  

The Federal government since 1930 had a strong hold on the nation’s economy and society. It lead to the unconstitutional exertion of power throughout. The New deal was a total disaster as it was not appreciated by Roosevelt who failed to meet the needs of the American citizens.

You might be interested in
How is catherine the great described as an absolute monarch
meriva
Catherine can be described a such because she had no constitution for her country. She ruled by her own decision not by a written code. Her laws had to be upheld. She herself quoted that, "The Sovereign is Absolute." 

hope that helped;P
5 0
3 years ago
The republican party began as a group of people that believed what
Harlamova29_29 [7]
The Republican party began as a coalition of anti-slavery "Conscience Whigs<span>" and </span>Free Soil Democrats<span> opposed to the </span>Kansas–Nebraska Act<span>, submitted to Congress by </span>Stephen Douglas<span> in January 1854.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Persia was divided into spheres of influence in .
Stolb23 [73]

Persia was divided into spheres of influence in 1907.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify the early stages taken during the criminal law process.
ivolga24 [154]

Arrest

Criminal prosecution typically begins with an arrest by a police officer. A police officer may arrest a person if (1) the officer observes the person committing a crime; (2) the officer has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed by that person; or (3) the officer makes the arrest under the authority of a valid arrest warrant. After the arrest, the police books the suspect. When the police complete the booking process, they place the suspect in custody. If the suspect commited a minor offense, the policy may issue a citation to the suspect with instructions to appear in court at a later date.

Bail

If a suspect in police custody is granted bail, the suspect may pay the bail amount in exchange for a release. Release on bail is contingent on the suspect's promise to appear at all scheduled court proceedings. Bail may be granted to a suspect immediately after booking or at a later bail review hearing. Alternatively, a suspect may be released on his "own recognizance." A suspect released on his own recognizance need not post bail, but must promise in writing to appear at all scheduled court appearances. Own recognizance release is granted after the court considers the seriousness of the offense, and the suspect's criminal record, threat to the community and ties to family and employment.

Arraignment

The suspect makes his first court appearance at the arraignment. During arraignment, the judge reads the charges filed against the defendant in the complaint and the defendant chooses to plead "guilty," "not guilty" or "no contest" to those charges. The judge will also review the defendant's bail and set dates for future proceedings.

Preliminary Hearing or Grand Jury Proceedings

The government generally brings criminal charges in one of two ways: by a "bill of information" secured by a preliminary hearing or by grand jury indictment. In the federal system, cases must be brought by indictment. States, however, are free to use either process. Both preliminary hearings and grand juries are used to establish the existence of probable cause. If there is no finding of probable cause, a defendant will not be forced to stand trial.

A preliminary hearing, or preliminary examination, is an adversarial proceeding in which counsel questions witnesses and both parties makes arguments. The judge then makes the ultimate finding of probable cause. The grand jury, on the other hand, hears only from the prosecutor. The grand jury may call their own witnesses and request that further investigations be performed. The grand jury then decides whether sufficient evidence has been presented to indict the defendant.

Pre-Trial Motions

Pre-trial motions are brought by both the prosecution and the defense in order to resolve final issues and establish what evidence and testimony will be admissible at trial.

Trial

At trial, the judge or the jury will either find the defendant guilty or not guilty. The prosecution bears the burden of proof in a criminal trial. Thus, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crimes charged. The defendant has a constitutional right to a jury trial in most criminal matters. A jury or judge makes the final determination of guilt or innocence after listening to opening and closing statements, examination and cross-examination of witnesses and jury instructions. If the jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict, the judge may declare a mistrial, and the case will either be dismissed or a new jury will be chosen. If a judge or jury finds the defendant guilty, the court will sentence the defendant.

4 0
3 years ago
Bill Clinton helped create a large free market among Canada, the United States, and Mexico with ratification of the ________ tre
Artyom0805 [142]

Answer:

NAFTA

Explanation:

The NAFTA, the short for the North American Free Trade Agreement, was signed by the former President Bill Clinton as he supported neoliberal reforms between the member states of Canada, US and Mexico.

He is famous for a speech where he expresses the alleged gains that were promised on December 1993.

According to him, "NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. Interesting would be to notice whether the results were indeed generalized to the workers and the economy of the neighbouring countries. Undoubtly the Treaty has boosted economical activity, however from a sociological or crticial view, even at that time Congress strongly debated the consequences in the future.

In Mexico this caused the increased dependency and assymetric relationship between North and South that today continues to be a challenge in the world. Causing the gap between economies to broaden.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When did Aksum start becoming a major trading hub?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following occurred after coalition troops entered Kuwait
    8·1 answer
  • Where is the city of Babylon located
    7·2 answers
  • How do you determine overall mission risk?
    13·1 answer
  • What are two ways that greek city states were governed
    11·1 answer
  • Who supported the 14th amendment
    9·2 answers
  • Who was involved in the american civil war
    11·1 answer
  • 15 POINTS PLEASE HELP OR I'm GOING TO FAIL THE CLASS.
    14·1 answer
  • Describe the economic situation for people in the U.S. During the great depression
    14·1 answer
  • Reasons for women's involvement in the struggle for human rights in the 1950s and 1960s​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!