1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gekata [30.6K]
3 years ago
11

Implicit memory is to explicit memory as ________ is to ________

Social Studies
1 answer:
astra-53 [7]3 years ago
3 0
Implicit memory is to explicit memory as Priming is to Episodic memory
<span>Priming is a form of memory that in which a response to one stimulus influences the response to another stimulus. Episodic memory is a piece of memory from our experience that we could associate with a specific sense of emotions and other contexts</span>
You might be interested in
After he suffered a stroke, mr. santore's physical coordiantion skills and responsivelnes to sensory stimulation quckly returned
Sladkaya [172]
The correct answer is association areas.

Association areas refer to brain areas in the cerebral cortex that are responsible for memory, learning and thought (refer to attached image). This area of the brain links sensory and motor areas of the brain. Mr. Santore's difficulties in finding and locating places appears to be a result of damage to his association and cerebral cortex. 

3 0
3 years ago
Where did De Soto expeditionary force land
cricket20 [7]
I can't find anything but I found this if it helps I'm sorry If I didn't

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.history.com/.amp/topics/exploration/hernando-de-soto
5 0
3 years ago
Most of the group decides to use the wood to build a fence, which would divide the island from the beach. But some people don’t
jonny [76]

It wouldn't be fair but it would be more unfair if the majority lost so it would make more sense to build the fence with less opposition then build something else with the wood with more.

sorry if that was confusing ><

7 0
3 years ago
Which new Soviet policy granted the people of the USSR more decision making power and greater access to private ownership of bus
umka21 [38]
It was perostroika I believe
6 0
3 years ago
What democratic principles were advanced
TEA [102]
1. Rights come from God, not government

This Founding Principle is actually embedded in our Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

The Founders didn’t believe governments bestowed rights, nor were they an agent to protect rights—governments were the ones that abridged rights.

2. All political power emanates from the people

The Founders were strongly influenced by John Locke, who advocated government as a social contract. The term, will of the governed, encapsulates this concept, which means the people are boss. The power of the people is declared in the first three words of the Constitution, “We the people …” This principle is also the underlying basis for our Declaration of Independence, “governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”

This principle dictated that conventions of the people were the only authorizing force to ratify the Constitution. Neither Congress nor the state legislatures had the power.

Delegate William Paterson, author of the New Jersey Plan, wrote, “What is a Constitution? It is the form of government, delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first principles of fundamental law are established.”

3. Limited representative republic

The Founders believed in limited government in the form of a representative republic. They distrusted a direct democracy, because they equated it to mob rule. James Madison constantly preached against any system that allowed special interests (factions) to gain control of the government. He showed that throughout history, majority factions tyrannized minorities, whether the minorities be based on race, wealth, religion, or even geography.

The Founders believed that to protect against government oppression, they must disperse power, and give each branch of government formidable checks on the authority of every other branch. By the end of the Constitutional Convention, the Founders also came to firmly believe that the states must act as a solid check on the national government. Last, monarchies had general power, so they would give the national government only delineated powers.

4. Written Constitution

If government is a social contract, and it has only limited power formally delegated by the people, then the contract—Constitution—must be in writing. The strongest proponent of a written constitution was Thomas Paine, who said, “[A]n unwritten constitution is not a constitution at all.” This may seem commonplace today, but England, the most powerful nation on earth, had no written constitution. This was different in America, however, where all thirteen states had a written constitution. This American tradition goes back to the Mayflower Compact. Our national heritage is a written constitution that sets the rules for governance between the people and their elected representatives. The Founders intent was that this contract would only be changed through the amendment process.

5. Private Property Rights

The Founders were influenced by Adam Smith, and were firm believers in private property rights. In their minds, private property rights were intertwined with liberty. True liberty would never allow the government to come at any time and take a person’s property. That would be Divine Right, which they had fought eight bloody years to escape.

James Madison said, “As a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.” He meant that even if a person owned nothing else, he still owned his rights, which were the most valuable property of all.

The Constitutional Convention delegates didn’t agree on everything. In fact, they possibly only agreed on these Founding Principles. After all, they did argue for four months about the design of the government.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • New research contends that people will judge the legitimacy of a new venture though their own lenses because of their different
    9·1 answer
  • Ahmed is an artist who has been working on a particular sculpture. Because he was enjoying the creative process so much, he did
    5·1 answer
  • Absorption lines occur when?
    6·2 answers
  • Supreme court justices have often been active in the selection of new justices. do you think this is appropriate? explain your a
    11·1 answer
  • According to some political and legal researchers, why can competitive federalism create a "race to the bottom"?
    7·1 answer
  • In the late nineteenth century, political "machines" in cities owed their existence to the
    7·1 answer
  • The government has the right to take homes for public use through
    9·1 answer
  • Broker Bob is discussing a potential listing with Seller Sam, who says he will not entertain any offers from Orientals. What sho
    9·1 answer
  • Unitary and Federal systems essential questions: The US and United Kingdom have different systems of government. Explain how the
    11·1 answer
  • HRLPFCHfUvFuShdhhshdhdu
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!