Answer:
a. 19.750 b. 138.250
Explanation:
A. We divide 158.000 by 8 to get the amount per year
158.000/8= 19.750
- Amortization expense (Db) 19.750
- Accumulated amortization (Cr) 19.750
B. On the balance sheet at the end of the first year, we would subtract those 19.750 to the gross value of the patent and the value of the patent would be
158.000 - 19.750 = 138.250
<u><em>Net carrying amount of the patent:</em></u><em> 138.250</em>
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.
Answer:
The answer is: False
Explanation:
Whenever a company wants to go international it has a lot work to do before creating an international division. Several things must be done before, mostly research, for example:
- Research if your product is know overseas, is there any possible market for it, are there any restraints for your products in those new markets.
- Any legal constraint or logistical problem you have to consider.
- Any local competition you have to worry about.
- Does your product fit in a new culture.
- And very many etceteras.
That should all be done before considering spending money on creating an international division.
Probably when the internet didn´t exist, communications were scarce, no Tv existed, people in one country didn´t know anything about other cultures, etc., a comp nay would have first created an international division to scout foreign markets but right now it doesn´t make sense.
Answer: A. It has a competitive advantage in the industry
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that the average cost of production for a bottle of water in the industry is 0.20 cents while its average price is 0.50 cents and that Water Inc. manufactures the same product for 0.10 cents while its average price is 0.40 cents.
The scenario shows that Water Inc has a competitive advantage in the industry. This is seen as the bottle of water is produced at a cheaper cost wen compared to its rivals.
Answer:
i think it is 31 i hope this helps brainlist pls
