Answer:
Your answer is given below:
Explanation:
Statement showing Computations
Paticulars Amount
Variable overhead cost per unit =100,000/1,000 100.00
Standard Variable overhead for 750 Units = 750 * 100 75,000.00
Actual Variable overhead 75,000.00
Variable overhead spending variance= Standard VO - Actual VO
Variable overhead spending variance= 75,000 - 75,000
Variable overhead spending variance= 0
Answer:
The correct answer is: 1. Functional.
Explanation:
A functional strategy is one that requires the HOW? Do, operate, function, that is, after delimiting the corporate strategy that specifies what to do ?, the functional strategy, indicates how to apply and use resources to achieve what you want to achieve.
A functional area of the company adopts this type of strategy to achieve the objectives embodied in the strategy of the corporation, maximizing the resources available and their productivity. In addition, it seeks the care and development of functional and operational capacity in order to achieve a competitive advantage to the company.
These strategies generate a frame of reference used by the administration of operations and functions to support the organizational and business strategy.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. For the maximum amount that spend each month on mortgage payment is
= Gross annual income ÷ total number of months in a year × mortgage payment percentage
= $39,600 ÷ 12 months × 28%
= $924
b. . For the maximum amount that spend each month on total credit obligatons
= Gross annual income ÷ total number of months in a year × mortgage payment percentage
= $39,600 ÷ 12 months × 36%
= $1,188
c. Now the maximum amount spend for all other debt is
For monthly mortgage
= $924 × 70%
= $646.8
And, for mortgage debt
= $1,188 × 70%
= $831.60
Answer:
A. moral hazard
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this scenario is perfectly exemplifying the term known as a moral hazard. This refers to when an individual takes more risks because someone else is bearing the costs. Such as in this scenario, Christopher is an employee and should be working on company tasks but instead works on his own projects because the company cannot check up on him, which is morally wrong and he can get fired for it.
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
Ovalles was an M&M contractor to perform work assigned by M&M. As the question says, <em>"Cox had minimal contact with him and limited power to control the manner in which he performed his duties."</em>. That is the main feature of a contractor, different from an employee who works directly for Cox. The liability is completely of M&M.
