Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the product recall is probable and predicted that the cost to the company is $2.8 million so this represent the contingent liability as it is probable & estimated
So the same should be disclosed and reported
Hence, the answer should be yes
The same is to considered relevant
It's to insure that manufacturers honor their warranties and to reduce the chance that a consumer will be misled about the nature of the purchase.
Answer:
Explanation:
The ending retained earnings = beginning retained earnings + net income - Dividends Paid
Net income = ending retained earnings - beginning retained earnings + Dividends Paid
= $833,000 - $724,000 + $50,000
= $159000.
Therefore, the net income for the year is $159000.
Answer:
C. moral hazard.
Explanation:
Moral hazard -
It is the condition , where the person take more risk , as he or she is aware that someone else need to bear the risk , is known as moral hazard .
In this case , one of the party can change the damage of other after any type of monetary transaction has occurred .
Hence , from the question ,
The statement given in the question , is about Moral hazard .
This is an example of "proximal goal".
Proximal objectives are best characterized as here and now and are instrumental in accomplishing distal objectives in which are long haul. The proximal objectives are the giving wellsprings of extra data in regards to exhibitions that isn't uncovered with a distal objective. It is basic that proximal objectives are more sensible to achieve the fulfillment on account of the time hole in getting the objectives. For a complex task, it would not bode well to have distal objectives set up in light of the fact that it at that point would set aside a long span of opportunity to close outcomes in a snappy way.
