The history of the American Revolution does not prove that owning small firearms is a means for citizens to defend themselves.
<h3 /><h3>Does the American Revolution support the Second Amendment?</h3>
Proponents of the Second Amendment had the notion that if civilians had small firearms, they would be able to defend themselves against tyrannical governments.
Yet this was not the case in the American Revolution because the people could not rely on small firearms to defend themselves against the British.
They had to rely on heavy artillery and arms which was what the British had as well.
Find out more on the Second Amendment at brainly.com/question/1750552.
#SPJ1
Your going to have to be much more specific. Progress in what?
One conclusion would be that the main goal of the Spanish in almost all cases was to find and bring back gold, another would be that the natives were demolished, and another would be that steel was their most valuable weapon.
Explanation:
Some Native Americans regenerate to Christianity however others did not.
Early Spanish explorers fail to search out a lot of gold north of United Mexican States, therefore, a settlement was restricted to far off missions and defensive outpost.
Spanish missionaries gave native Americans with smart materials, education, and protection however generally abused them.
Answer:
They made uniforms and blankets for the soldiers.
Explanation:
