1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ExtremeBDS [4]
3 years ago
14

Were Americans justified in expanding west?

History
1 answer:
Fittoniya [83]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

From this point of view, westward expansion was justified.   Americans were superior to the Indians and the Mexicans in terms of their culture and their race (this is the idea of Manifest Destiny).   In addition, might made right and America was justified in taking land if it had the power to do so.

You might be interested in
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In your opinion, was the Spanish-American War and the war in the Philippines necessary? Why or why not?
sashaice [31]

Answer:

yes cause a lot of pple died in that war

Explanation:

the Philippines revolt against the US for independence

8 0
2 years ago
The Antebellum South What was life like for slaves prior to the beginning of the Civil War? Use examples from Harriet’s narrativ
Oliga [24]

Answer:

In the Antebellum South, most slaves had difficult times characterized by poverty, very long-work hours doing demanding physical tasks, and psychological and physical abuse. They also had their families frequently torn apart.

Women, as recorded in Harriet Ann Jacobs work, were vicitms of sexual abuse on a constant basis.

Not all slaves were abused, and some slaves acquired relative wealth and status, but they were the minority. The vast majority of slaves had extremely difficult living conditions, and most importantly, they lacked the liberty that the US Constitution was supposed to guarantee.

6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME ILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST
Oxana [17]

Answer:

1 )The failures of the Crusades hurt the Pope's authority in Europe.

2 )The crusades disobeyed and followed the pope

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The oil companies in the 1990's began to access new oil deposits in ______________
scoundrel [369]

Answer:

B)

Explanation:

Following the oil price shock of 1990 caused by the invasion of Kuwait by Saddam Hussein's Iraq, oil prices soared from 17 dollars per barrel to 36 dollars per barrel.

The demand for oil in this decade was enormous and oil companies carried out a lot of researches to discover oil. During the 1990s, oil companies began to access discovered oil deposits in places like Alaska, the gulf of Mexico, the Caspian sea and many other places to supply the rising demands.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did we attack the Spanish Fleet in the Philippines half a world away from Cuba?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the colonies other than Massechustes become concerned about the Intolerable Acts
    14·1 answer
  • The 1970s marked an important shift, as terrorists began to target and murder civilians. Which 1972 event marked the beginning o
    14·2 answers
  • A player touching the net on teh receiving team is called a
    7·1 answer
  • How did albert einstein’s gas absorption heat pump affect people and what did it do
    7·1 answer
  • What country established the world's largest empire
    15·2 answers
  • What is Jefferson’s opinion about the purchase? How can you tell?
    6·2 answers
  • How much days in ramadan?​
    11·2 answers
  • Do you agree that the Electoral College is still the most
    10·1 answer
  • What caused changes to the traditional American culture after World War II ended?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!