answer: It is about the significance of race during an era of injustice and how one specific race can change the mind of others
Explanation: The author explains that the picture was paid for by a white person and expresses the hope for people to realize the fact that injustice is unacceptable. The fact the author stresses the fact that a person of the white or caucasian race wanted others to see the injustice of a minority race means that something like that doesn't happen often and its something to be excited about since it indicates change. The author expressing the pain they feel when a white audience makes unsettling faces at their friend means said minority isn't favored or seen as less by the in this case superior minority(whites). The fact that a white person paid to expose injustice to the general public means they are more inclined to listen and change their ways. This is why the author says the picture may help people see that injustice amongst others is wrong.
The answer is 2 because they are not meaning it in a violent way so it's not 1, there is no sign of disinterest so it's not 4, and it's not talking about acceptance so it can't bring 3. Therefore the answer is 2.
Steinbeck uses the word choice to help add details to his tone of the article. He feels that migrant workers are often overlooked for the work that they do. By adding word choices such as ...(find your own examples of the word choice)... Steinbeck is able to convince the reader to feel a certain way about these migrant workers and add to his original point. Don't copy exactly what I said please, but hope that makes sense ;)
Not exactly sure what the question is :)
I was in a state of abandonment when my dad moved away from home.
