Hi there! It is definitely not a law. A is our. It’s not a hypothesis, because it’s been proven numerous times. B is out. Speaking of which, that leads to theory, which makes sense, because it’s been proven numerous times, and it doesn’t exactly fit the definition of an observation. Theory definitely fits best out of all of these answers. The answer is C: A theory.
Answer:
if the results are efficient in answering the problems raised in the research and if they manage to come to terms with the hypotheses.
Explanation:
As you may know, scientific research must be done through several steps that allow an experiment to be carried out in order to reach conclusions on a certain topic.
In research on the carbon cycle and global warming, it is necessary for the researcher to raise problems and questions about this topic, as well as to raise hypotheses that must be directly related to the results of the experiment. If the result of the experiment is efficient in answering the research problems and questions, in addition to being able to agree with the presented hypotheses, it means that the research has value within the scientific branch in which it fits, in addition to showing that the experiment was done correctly.
Hello there
the answer is central nervous system
Hope this helped best regards Queen Z
Explanation:
A population's maximum number of individuals which may be supported by an environment or habitat. This occurs after the available resources have been exploited beyond their limit- i.e. the resources have been depleted at a faster rate than they have been renewed. At this stage, the population significantly decreases in size as some individuals die off due to scarcity and competition.
Learn more about abiotic and biotic factors at brainly.com/question/11015328 and brainly.com/question/1542938
#LearnWithBrainly