Answer:
d. all of the above
Explanation:
Arbitration is a legal technique of resolving disputes outside the courts, whereby parties involved in the dispute refer it to an arbitrator (the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal") or arbitrators( one or more persons) , by whose decision (the "award") they may be bound(as in mandatory arbitration) or not(as in voluntary or nonbinding arbitration).
The above methods of arbitration :peer review, arbitration, mediation all allow the dispute parties' input before arbitration decision. Peer review method involves dispute resolution in the workplace whereby employees are able to take disputes to fellow employees and managers to act as arbitrator to resolve disputes which may not be binding on the parties. Mediation on another hand is a dynamic method of dispute resolution where a third party helps to resolve disputes by helping dispute parties negotiate to resolve to dispute. Arbitration however differs from mediation in that the arbitrator makes decisions based on evidence presented and not waiting to negotiate an agreement between both parties. All three methods however require dispute parties to make inputs so as to arrive on final decision.
I believe it’s A. as the Dr. is letting their client do most of the talking which is what client-centres therapy is said to be.
Answer: When we let the ego speak louder, it becomes dangerous because we find ourselves superior to everything and everyone around us.
One has many difficulties in assuming that one has made mistakes, thus never being able to learn from one's mistakes. This can end up affecting the realization that she herself is causing certain problems and may end up blaming and seeking other people for things that go wrong.
The idea of gestaltism was in response to the functionalism and structuralism of the time which were the two pervasive schools of thought in psychology. The gestaltist idea was very influential at the time and is still very influential today.
Answer:
Explanation:
Some women believed that they were not treated as un-equals; rather, they were just treated differently. ... It was put together by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott who recognized that many abolitionists thought that women were not equal to men.