Answer:
The correct answer is option (b) 44,000
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
From the question given, the first step to take is to find out how many square feet would the Building Maintenance cost be allocated
Now,
The Square feet over which Building Maintenance cost would be allocated is stated as follows:
The Square feet over which Building Maintenance cost would be allocated = Square Footage of Machining + Square Footage of Assembly = 18000 + 26000
Thus,
=18000 + 26000 = 44,000
Answer: A. the company will be willing to pay a different amount for this resource.
Explanation:
The upper limit for the resource was 18 and anything up to 18 would have attracted the same shadow price (price company estimated it was willing to pay for access to this resource).
The access was increased past this limit however to 18.01. The company therefore will now have more access to the resource and so will be willing to pay a different amount for the resource.
Answer:
Profit Maximisation
Explanation:
Profit is the difference between total revenue (receipts) from sale & total cost (expenditure) on production.
Total Revenue = Price x Quantity ; Total Cost = Average Cost x Quantity
Economists study all the producer behaviour, based on assumption that : Goal of firm is Profit Maximisation.
Maximising Profit implies maximising the difference between Total Revenue & Total Cost [ TR - TC] . This further leads to producer equilibrium rule of Marginal Revenue = Marginal Cost [MR = MC] ; i.e additional revenue per unit sold equals additional cost per unit production.
In order to verify the quality and integrity of completes
visuals, you should NOT ask yourself the question “Is the
visual doing the job?”
<span>One needs to ensure visual and textual
flow in order to have successful integration with text involves for decisions.</span>
Answer:
decreased by 20%
Explanation:
Supposed we have input price of $30,000 and it produced an output of 300 units on the first year of operation. The cost per unit on the first year is $100 each ($30,000/300).
On the second year we still have the same input expense of $30,000 but the productivity output increased by 25%. So we have 375 units produced on the second year’s operation. The new cost per unit would be $30,000/375=$80 per unit.
Therefore we conclude that based on the example given, the new unit cost per product decreases by 20%.
$100-80 = $20
$20/$100 = 20%
