All categories

3 years ago

ASAP! Giving brainliest for CORRECT awnser.

Business

2 answers:

ivann1987 [24]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

d i think

Explanation:

since she cares about the enviroment

Brainlest?

notka56 [123]3 years ago

4 0

I believe it is: A. Risk Taking

You might be interested in

If the exchange rate is 5 Egyptian pounds per U.S. dollar, a watch that costs $25 US dollars costs a. 125 Egyptian pounds b. 50

Anon25 [30]

Answer:

A. 125 Egyptian pounds

Explanation:

Let’s create a proportion using the following setup.

pounds/dollars=pounds/dollars

We know that 5 Egyptian pounds is equal to 1 dollar.

5 pounds/ 1 dollar= pounds/dollars

We don’t know how many pounds are in 25 dollars. We can say x pounds are in 25 dollars.

5 pounds / 1 dollar = x pounds/ 25 dollars

5/1=x/25

We want to find out what x is, so we need to get x by itself.

x is being divided by 25. The inverse of division is multiplication. Multiply both sides of the equation by 25.

25*(5/1)=(x/25)*25

25*5/1=x

25*5=x

125=x

$25 US dollars are equal to 125 Egyptian pounds. Therefore, the watch will cost 125 Egyptian pounds and choice A is correct.

5 0

3 years ago

A firm is considering a project requiring an investment of $30,000. The project would generate an annual cash flow of $7,251 for

Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

c.12%

Explanation:

PVF of 12% for 6 years is 4.11

PVFof 11% for 6 years is 4.23

Present value of cash inflows, 12% = 7251*4.11

Present value of cash inflows, 12% = 29801.61

Present value of cash inflows, 11% = 7251*4.23

Present value of cash inflows, 11% = 30671.73

Internal rate of return = 11% + (30671.73 - 30000)/(30671.73-29801.61)

Internal rate of return = 11.7719969659%

Internal rate of return = 11.772%

3 0

3 years ago

Because of an accident Royce was involved in, his insurance company has increased his annual premium for auto insurance by 5. 2%

PSYCHO15rus [73]

Premium is often paid by people based on some kinds of services offered.

From the picture attached, we can see Royce' premiums for the previous year, which were;

Bodily injury $22.50
Property damage $144.75
Collision $275.75
Comprehensive $100

If you add all together, the total premium of the policy was $543

Note that the premiums will increase by 5.2%,

therefore, the new total premium will be = $543 x 1.052 = $571.24

Learn more from

brainly.com/question/13880376

7 0

2 years ago

CAAT Traders acquired machinery on 1 July 20.18 for an amount of R175 300. This machinery was only available for use from 1 Sept

Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

The depreciation expenses to be shown in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended (31-05-2019) is R26,295.

<h3>What is depreciation?</h3>

Depreciation can be defined as a process in which the monetary (financial) value of an asset decreases or falls over time, especially due to wear and tear.

<h3>How to determine the depreciation expenses?</h3>

First of all, we would calculate the expected number of units produced by CAAT as follows:

Expected number of units produced = 15,000 + 13,000 + 11,000 + 10,500 + 10,500

Expected number of units produced = 60,000.

Mathematically, the depreciation expenses is given by:

Depreciation expenses = Actual units produced/expected units produced × cost price

Substituting the given parameters into the formula, we have;

Depreciation expenses = 9,000/60,000 × 175,300

Depreciation expenses = R26,295.

Read more on depreciation expenses here: brainly.com/question/25806993

#SPJ1

7 0

1 year ago

The race to the bottom scenario of global environmental degradation is explained roughly like this:

DIA [1.3K]

Answer:

A. Profit-seeking multinational companies shift their production from countries with strong environmental standards to countries with weak standards, thus reducing their costs and increasing their profits.

D. self-sufficiency argument.

Explanation:

In the case when there is a race to the bottom scenario so it would be described that the multinational companies that are profit seeking is shifting their production from that countries who have the strong environmental standards to the weak standard countries so that the order would be decreased due to this the profit would increase

In the other case, when the nation is not too much depend on other countries for supplies so this case we called as self-sufficiency argument as they managed themselves rather depending on another

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers