1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aliina [53]
2 years ago
9

Ariel, Fouad, Nicola, and Daryush are four managers at Lost Soles Shoes. Each uses a different decision-making style and believe

s that their style is the best. Ariel always presents the problem to her employees and gathers their opinions and suggestions, but makes the decision herself. Fouad gives his employees the responsibility for making the decision within a set of specified boundary conditions. Nicola makes the decision without asking her employees for their opinions or suggestions. Daryush presents the problem to his employees and seeks consensus, emphasizing that her opinion is only as important as every other employee's in her department. Which of the following decision making styles is Nicola displaying?
A) consultative
B) autocratic
C) delegative
D) facilitative
E) negotiative
Business
1 answer:
Zanzabum2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B) autocratic

Explanation:

Nicola is displaying the decision-making style known as autocratic. This is because she is not asking for input or advice from employees, and instead makes the entire decision herself. Therefore, she is taking complete control over the situation by doing so and also taking full responsibility of both the situation and the possible consequences that may arise from the decision that she has made. This form of fast, controlling, action is part of an autocratic decision-making style.

You might be interested in
Suppose that output (Y ) in an economy is given by the following aggregate production function: Yt = Kt + Nt where Kt is capital
shusha [124]

Answer:

Check the explanation

Explanation:

Yt = Kt + Nt

Taking output per worker, we divide by Nt

Yt/Nt = Kt/Nt + 1

yt = kt + 1

where yt is output per worker and kt is capital per worker.

a) With population being constant, savings rate s and depreciation rate δ.

ΔKt = It - δKt

dividing by Nt, we get

ΔKt/Nt = It/Nt - δKt/Nt ..... [1]

for kt = Kt/Nt, taking derivative

d(kt)/dt = d(Kt/Nt)/dt ... since Nt is a constant, we have

d(kt)/dt = d(Kt/Nt)/dt = (dKt/dt)/Nt = ΔKt/Nt = It/Nt - δKt/Nt = it - δkt

thus, Capital accumulation Δkt = i – δkt

In steady state, Δkt = 0

That is I – δkt = 0

S = I means that I = s.yt

Thus, s.yt – δkt = 0

Then kt* = s/δ(yt) = s(kt+1)/(δ )

kt*= skt/(δ) + s/(δ)

kt* - skt*/(δ) = s/(δ)

kt*(1- s/(δ) = s/(δ)

kt*((δ - s)/(δ) = s/(δ)

kt*(δ-s)) = s

kt* = s/(δ -s)

capital per worker is given by kt*

b) with population growth rate of n,

d(kt)/dt = d(Kt/Nt)/dt =

= \frac{\frac{dKt}{dt}Nt - \frac{dNt}{dt}Kt}{N^{2}t}

= \frac{dKt/dt}{Nt} - \frac{dNt/dt}{Nt}.\frac{Kt}{Nt}

= ΔKt/Nt - n.kt

because (dNt/dt)/Nt = growth rate of population = n and Kt/Nt = kt (capital per worker)

so, d(kt)/dt = ΔKt/Nt - n.kt

Δkt = ΔKt/Nt - n.kt = It/Nt - δKt/Nt - n.kt ......(from [1])

Δkt = it - δkt - n.kt

at steady state Δkt = it - δkt - n.kt = 0

s.yt - (δ + n)kt = 0........... since it = s.yt

kt* = s.yt/(δ + n) =s(kt+1)/(δ + n)

kt*= skt/(δ + n) + s/(δ + n)

kt* - skt*/(δ + n) = s/(δ + n)

kt*(1- s/(δ + n)) = s/(δ + n)

kt*((δ + n - s)/(δ + n)) = s/(δ + n)

kt*(δ + n -s)) = s

kt* = s/(δ + n -s)

.... is the steady state level of capital per worker with population growth rate of n.

3. a) capital per worker. in steady state Δkt = 0 therefore, growth rate of kt is zero

b) output per worker, yt = kt + 1

g(yt) = g(kt) = 0

since capital per worker is not growing, output per worker also does not grow.

c)capital.

kt* = s/(δ + n -s)

Kt*/Nt = s/(δ + n -s)

Kt* = sNt/(δ + n -s)

taking derivative with respect to t.

d(Kt*)/dt = s/(δ + n -s). dNt/dt

(dNt/dt)/N =n (population growth rate)

so dNt/dt = n.Nt

d(Kt*)/dt = s/(δ + n -s).n.Nt

dividing by Kt*

(d(Kt*)/dt)/Kt* = s/(δ + n -s).n.Nt/Kt* = sn/(δ + n -s). (Nt/Kt)

\frac{sn}{\delta +n-s}.\frac{Nt}{Kt}

using K/N = k

\frac{s}{\delta +n-s}.\frac{n}{kt}

plugging the value of kt*

\frac{sn}{\delta +n-s}.\frac{(\delta + n -s)}{s}

n

thus, Capital K grows at rate n

d) Yt = Kt + Nt

dYt/dt = dKt/dt + dNt/dt = s/(δ + n -s).n.Nt + n.Nt

using d(Kt*)/dt = s/(δ + n -s).n.Nt from previous part and that (dNt/dt)/N =n

dYt/dt = n.Nt(s/(δ + n -s) + 1) = n.Nt(s+ δ + n -s)/(δ + n -s) = n.Nt((δ + n)/(δ + n -s)

dYt/dt = n.Nt((δ + n)/(δ + n -s)

dividing by Yt

g(Yt) = n.(δ + n)/(δ + n -s).Nt/Yt

since Yt/Nt = yt

g(Yt) = n.(δ + n)/(δ + n -s) (1/yt)

at kt* = s/(δ + n -s), yt* = kt* + 1

so yt* = s/(δ + n -s) + 1 = (s + δ + n -s)/(δ + n -s) = (δ + n)/(δ + n -s)

thus, g(Yt) = n.(δ + n)/(δ + n -s) (1/yt) =  n.(δ + n)/(δ + n -s) ((δ + n -s)/(δ + n)) = n

therefore, in steady state Yt grows at rate n.

5 0
3 years ago
Variable costs for Coronado Industries are 30% of sales. Its selling price is $120 per unit. If Coronado sells one unit more tha
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

Income will increase by $84.

Explanation:

<u>The break-even point is the number of units required to cover the fixed costs. Net income is zero.</u>

First, we need to calculate the unitary variable cost:

Unitary variable cost= 120*0.3= $36

<u>Now, the unitary contribution margin:</u>

unitary contribution margin= 120 - 36

unitary contribution margin= $84

Income will increase by $84.

8 0
2 years ago
Use the following information for questions 6 and 7. Wonderland Company imports and sells a product produced in Canada. In the s
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:

$1,564,800

Explanation:

Year   Purchased Quantity (Units)   Cost per unit   Total Cost

2017                 4,000                              $160               $640,000

2018               10,000                              $220            $2,220,000

2019               16,000                               $320           $5,120,000

(A) Sales Revenue

2019              18,400                                $392                       $7,212,800

(B) Less: Cost of Goods Sold (LIFO)

2019              (16,000 x $320)                        ($5,120,000)

2018              {(18,400 - 16,000) x $220}          ($528,000)

(A - B)Gross Profit                                                                      $1,564,800

7 0
3 years ago
What are the portfolio weights for a portfolio that has 190 shares of Stock A that sell for $95 per share and 165 shares of Stoc
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

Portfolio weight - Stock A =  46.473%

Portfolio weight - Stock B = 53.527%

Explanation:

The weightage of portfolio refers to the amount of investment in each stock in the portfolio expressed as a percentage of total investment in the portfolio. The weightage of portfolio can be calculated by as follows,

Portfolio weightage = Investment in Stock A / Total Investment in Portfolio  +

Investment in Stock B / Total Investment in Portfolio  +  ...  +  

Investment in Stock N / Total Investment in Portfolio

Total investment in portfolio = 190 * 95  +  165 * 126  = 38840

Investment in Stock A = 190 * 95 = 18050

Investment in Stock B = 165 * 126 = 20790

Portfolio weight - Stock A = 18050 / 38840 = 46.473%

Portfolio weight - Stock B = 20790 / 38840 =53.527%

4 0
3 years ago
Terry took out a mortgage loan for $100,000 at an interest rate of 11.5% for 30 years. if terry had not had a bankruptcy on her
Mrrafil [7]

Because Terry had a bankruptcy on her credit report, the additional amount of interest that Terry is paying over the life of the loan is <u>$167,839.720</u>.

<h3>What is interest?</h3>

Interest is the finance charge for a loan or mortgage.

It is calculated on the principal amount based on the agreed rate and maturity period of the loan.

We can compute the interest using an online finance calculator as below.

<h3>Data and Calculations:</h3>

Home Price= $100,000

Down Payment = 0%

Loan Term = 30 years

Interest Rate = 11.5%

Monthly Payment:   $990.29

Normal monthly payment (without a bankruptcy) = $524.07

Total of 360 Mortgage Payments = $356,504.92 ($990.29 x 30 x 12)

Total of 360 Mortgage Payaments without bankruptcy = $188,665.20 ($524.07 x 30 x 12)

Additional payment in interest = $167,839.720 ($356,504.92 - $188,665.20)

Thus, the additional amount of interest that Terry is paying over the life of the loan is $167,839.720.

Learn more about interest calculations at brainly.com/question/25545513

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • On September 23, Reese Company received a $350 check from Mike Moluf for services to be performed in the future. The bookkeeper
    5·1 answer
  • Petar and Nikolas love the house that they just toured. It is a short sale for $180,000, which is a great price. They are very e
    10·1 answer
  • Crystal Glass recently paid $3.60 as an annual dividend. Future dividends are projected at $3.80, $4.10, and $4.25 over the next
    13·1 answer
  • Van pays the following medical expenses this year:
    13·1 answer
  • In March 2015, Daniela Motor Financing (DMF), offered some securities for sale to the public. Under the terms of the deal, DMF p
    11·1 answer
  • What is meant by requirements gathering, and why is it important to clearly define the data requirements of a database before cr
    11·1 answer
  • Return to questionItem 1Item 1 Judy's Boutique just paid an annual dividend of $3.01 on its common stock. The firm increases its
    11·1 answer
  • The price of imported oil rises. If the government wanted to stabilize output, which of the following could it do?
    9·2 answers
  • Because of the legal protection for intellectual property, such as patents, a firm has a better chance of recouping the costs of
    13·1 answer
  • The concept referring to the rights inherent in a supervisory position to give orders and expect the orders to be obeyed is:____
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!