1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hodyreva [135]
3 years ago
9

1. Do you agree with President Jackson's conclusions of the necessity for an Indian Removal Policy? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
yKpoI14uk [10]3 years ago
5 0
<span>I don't agree with President Jackson. I think the no one has the right to establish where do u have to live. No one can say to leave my home and that' what happend to Indians: they had to move to west USA.</span>
You might be interested in
Which of the following did Martin Luther believe was required for people to gain salvation? a. Faith b. Charity c. Bible study d
AveGali [126]
The answer is C, bible study. 

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do people support the Right to Bear Arms amendment?
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

Explanation:Modern debates about the Second Amendment have focused on whether it protects a private right of individuals to keep and bear arms, or a right that can be exercised only through militia organizations like the National Guard. This question, however, was not even raised until long after the Bill of Rights was adopted.

Many in the Founding generation believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people. English history suggested that this risk could be controlled by permitting the government to raise armies (consisting of full-time paid troops) only when needed to fight foreign adversaries. For other purposes, such as responding to sudden invasions or other emergencies, the government could rely on a militia that consisted of ordinary civilians who supplied their own weapons and received some part-time, unpaid military training.

The onset of war does not always allow time to raise and train an army, and the Revolutionary War showed that militia forces could not be relied on for national defense. The Constitutional Convention therefore decided that the federal government should have almost unfettered authority to establish peacetime standing armies and to regulate the militia.

This massive shift of power from the states to the federal government generated one of the chief objections to the proposed Constitution. Anti-Federalists argued that the proposed Constitution would take from the states their principal means of defense against federal usurpation. The Federalists responded that fears of federal oppression were overblown, in part because the American people were armed and would be almost impossible to subdue through military force.

Implicit in the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two shared assumptions. First, that the proposed new Constitution gave the federal government almost total legal authority over the army and militia. Second, that the federal government should not have any authority at all to disarm the citizenry. They disagreed only about whether an armed populace could adequately deter federal oppression.

The Second Amendment conceded nothing to the Anti-Federalists’ desire to sharply curtail the military power of the federal government, which would have required substantial changes in the original Constitution. Yet the Amendment was easily accepted because of widespread agreement that the federal government should not have the power to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms, any more than it should have the power to abridge the freedom of speech or prohibit the free exercise of religion.

Much has changed since 1791. The traditional militia fell into desuetude, and state-based militia organizations were eventually incorporated into the federal military structure. The nation’s military establishment has become enormously more powerful than eighteenth century armies. We still hear political rhetoric about federal tyranny, but most Americans do not fear the nation’s armed forces and virtually no one thinks that an armed populace could defeat those forces in battle. Furthermore, eighteenth century civilians routinely kept at home the very same weapons they would need if called to serve in the militia, while modern soldiers are equipped with weapons that differ significantly from those generally thought appropriate for civilian uses. Civilians no longer expect to use their household weapons for militia duty, although they still keep and bear arms to defend against common criminals (as well as for hunting and other forms of recreation).

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the most common cause of physical activity/sport related injury?
Nataly [62]

Answer:

fire.

Explanation:

According to the officals, fire can easily occur in sports related things

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP!!! ASAP!!
lutik1710 [3]

B).  France's King Phillip Vl snatched land from King Edward lll and retalliation had to follow.

5 0
3 years ago
Slave laws in the southern colonies in the 1600s
Fofino [41]
Slave law are like treat them property like land and they don't have right to talk over master. They need obey them
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Was farming or hunting easier in the region of mesopotamia
    6·1 answer
  • Which colonial document was the first in which the signers gave their consent to be governed according to the decisions made by
    7·1 answer
  • Bu parçadan hareketle Tanzimat edebiyatı ile ilgili
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these BEST shows Japan's attempts to establish a culture that was independent of Chinese influence?
    7·1 answer
  • What changes in America can we see today that were caused/created by this canal??
    14·1 answer
  • Which sentence from this excerpt of Abraham Lincoln's second inaugural address contains the best example of pathos?
    5·1 answer
  • Which explains why the reign of Pharaoh Hatshepsut was important?
    6·1 answer
  • During the invasion of Normandy,______ caused a one day delay of the invasion?
    14·1 answer
  • Please helpppppppp meeee
    11·2 answers
  • What was the relationship between soviet leaders and Eisenhower?<br><br> I’ll give brainiest
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!