A combined American and French army supported by A heavily armed French fleet.
<span>A tsar was removed from the people and was rarely seen.
The tsar of the early 1900s was an absolute monarch with much control and answered little to the people. Though there were attempts at reform and the creation of a representative body called the Duma, the Tsar, especially Nicholas II, was known to shut it down or event attempted to remove it. Nicholas II would be the last tsar of Russia being forced to abdicate, step down, his throne in 1917. </span>
I'd say B, because the armada was disrupted. No ships were burnt, but they were broken apart, meaning none returned. I hope this helps!
They were referred to as "Royal Colonies"; it's a term with British origins means those territories not annexed yet under its control.
Answer:
it was a feudalism type of government
Explanation:
local kings paid tribute to a high king or the king of all the petty ones. they had the same kind of society structure and even participated in the same kind and amount of trade as other kinfdoms and Empires except with commonly African tribes.
